Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of simethicone on the quality of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) examination.Methods A prospective study was performed in 90 patients received VCE examination from February 2010 to October 2014.The randomized table was set according to different dosage of simethicone the patients received,by which patients were divided into three groups.Group 1 (35 cases) received 15 mL simethicone,group 2 (30 cases) received 30 mL simethicone and control group (25 cases) received no simethicone.The small intestinal visualization quality of VCE was scored by segments.Segment A was proximal small intestine (one hour after VCE passing pylorus).Segment B was distal small intestine (one hour before VCE passing ileocecal valve).Segment A and B were scored according to the air bubbles and degree of cleanliness.Gastric transit time,small bowel transit time and VCE completion rate were recorded.Student's t test,Mann Whitney rank sum test and chi square test were performed for statistical analysis.Results The average scores of segment A of group 1,group 2 and control group were 0.58,0.33 and 1.67,respectively,and the average socres of segment B were 0.25,0.00 and 1.17,respectively.The lesion detection rates of group 1,group 2 and control group were 68.6％ (24/35),80.0％ (24/30) and 52.0％ (13/25),respectively,and the differences was statistically significant (x2 =8.238,P=0.016).The detection rate of group 2 was significantly higher than those of group 1 and control group (x2 =7.354 and 9.349,P=0.034 and 0.005).The detection rates of small intestinal erosion of group 1,group 2 and control group were 22.9％ (8/35),70.0％ (21/30) and 32.0％ (8/25),respectively,and the differences was statistically significant (x2=8.714,P=0.013).The detection rate of group 2 was significantly higher than those of group 1 and control group (x2 =10.600 and 7.380,P=0.005 and 0.025).There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rates of ulcer,vascular malformation and protrusion among the three groups (all P＞0.05).The detection rates of lesions＜0.5 cm of group 1,group 2 and control group were 37.1％ (13/35),66.7％ (20/30) and 32.0％ (8/25),respectively,and the differences was statistically significant (x2 =8.242,P=0.016).The detection rate of group 2 was significantly higher than those of group 1 and control group (x2 =9.250 and 7.842,P =0.011 and 0.017).Conclusion Oral adminstration of 30 mL simethicone could obviously decrease air bubbles in small intestine,and increase lesion detection rate of VCE.

Comparison of effects of streptavidin and dimethylsilicone oil on the detection rate of microscopic lesions under gastroscopy

Effect of Small Bowel Preparation with Simethicone on Capsule Endoscopy.

Effect of Premedication with Pronase Before Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Effect of Premedication With Pronase Before Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Effectiveness of Premedication with Pronase for Visualization of the Mucosa During Endoscopy： a Double-Blinded, Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized Study

Effects of simethicone on the quality of video capsule endoscopy examination

Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial.

[Comparison of Preoperative T Staging by Oral Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography and Double Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma].

Premedication with Reformulated Simethicone and Sodium Bicarbonate Improves Mucosal Visibility During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: a Double-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

[Efficacy and Safety of Digestive Tract Stent Placement under Direct Visual Endoscopy Without X-ray Monitoring in Treatment of Digestive Tract Stricture].

Observation on the Effect of Body Position Intervention Combined Pronase in Sifting Gastroscopy

Multicenter Study of Premedication of Pronase Granules to Improve Visibility During Gastroendoscopy

Influence of Sedation on the Detection Rate of Early Cancer and Precancerous Lesions During Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Prevention of White Flocculate Precipitation with Simethicone During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Double‐Blinded, Multi‐Center, Randomized Study

Study on the diagnostic signficance of conventional white light gastroscopy combined with magnifying gastroscopy with narrow - band imaging for atrophic gastritis and early gastric cancer.

Clinical Application of Simethicone Emulsion on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

A Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of Four Enhanced Magnifying Endoscopy for Diagnosis of Precancerous Lesions and Early Gastric Cancers

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy under Propofol‐based Sedation for Early Gastric Cancer and Pre‐cancerous Lesions is Associated with Better Diagnostic Accuracy: a Retrospective Cohort Study in China

Optimal timing of simethicone administration prior to upper endoscopy: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Effects of degreasing pretreatment on immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis of gastrointestinal and breast cancer samples

Case report: Streptomycin combined with dacronin in painless magnifying endoscopy