Abstract:AIM: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines provide significant benefits for patients after surgery. Care bundles combine various evidence-based treatments and care measures for managing refractory clinical diseases. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ERAS measures and care bundles to reduce post-operative complications associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and promote patients' recovery. METHODS: As a retrospective study, this study included 120 non-small cell lung carcinoma patients, who were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the post-operative care methods of the patients in the medical record system. Among them, sixty patients, admitted from January 2018 to January 2019, were included in the control group, and 60 patients, admitted from January 2022 to January 2023, were included in the observation group. The control group received routine care (non-ERAS group), and the observation group followed the bundles of care strategy based on ERAS guidelines (ERAS group). Data collected included baseline characteristics, clinical parameters, and post-operative parameters of patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The clinical data of all patients came from the hospital medical record system. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, smoking, and drinking between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in Cardiac Ejection fraction (≥50%), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec % (FEV1%) forced vital capacity (FVC), Lymphocyte, Neutrophils (%), and Tumor diameter between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, significant differences were found in FVC, FEV1%, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide single breath (DLCO SB), Albumin, C-reactive protein, Leukocyte, Monocytes, Lymphocyte (%), Hemoglobin, and Neutrophils between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p 12.5, FEV1% >112.9, Monocytes >16.8 (109/L), and Neutrophils >11.6, patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were more likely to experience a quick recover. When ERAS measures integrated bundles of care, the extubation time can reduced to less than 5.5 days, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to less than 3.5, and the post-operative hospital stay to less than 10.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS management measures based on bundles of care can significantly improve the prognosis of patients undergoing VATS lobectomy, reduce post-operative complications, and accelerate safe rehabilitation. Furthermore, they can greatly shorten hospital stays, lower overall healthcare costs, and alleviate social and family burdens. These significant differences may be related to factors such as Leukocytes, FEV1%, Monocytes, and Neutrophils.

Study on the Rehabilitation Effect of Different Chest Drainage Methods Based on the Concept of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery on Patients after VATS Lobectomy

Clinical Effects of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Perioperative Period Patients with Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

Video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with or without enhanced recovery after surgery: a single institution, prospective randomized controlled study

Comparison of the Results of Two Chest Tube Managements During an Enhanced Recovery Program after Video‐assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Trial

Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study

Clinical evaluation of the rapid recovery of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery under non-intubated anesthesia

Perioperative Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Open Lobectomy for Pt1-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in China: a Multi-Center Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Management of Bronchiectasis

Experience of Pulmonary Lobectomy with Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer of Early Stage

Clinical Analysis Between Completely Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Conventional Thoracotomy

[Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Lung Cancers: a Comparison Study Between Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Thoracotomy Lobectomy].

Is It Safe and Feasible to Use Multi-Lateral-pores Drainage Strategy after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery?

Randomized Controlled Trial of an Alternative Drainage Strategy Vs Routine Chest Tube Insertion for Postoperative Pain after Thoracoscopic Wedge Resection

Is VATS approach suitable in re-operations for postoperative hemothorax after pulmonary resection? Data analysis in a big volume thoracic center

Impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on thoracoscopic lobectomy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a propensity score-matched study

[Clinical Application of Completed Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy (with 186 Cases Report)].

Alternative Thoracic Drainage Strategy Alleviates Perioperative Pain After Lung Wedge Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Omitting Chest Tube Drainage after Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Compare the effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and limited axillary thoracotomy in treating spontaneous pneumothorax

Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Combined with Full Thoracoscopy in Patients with Radical Resection of Lung Cancer