Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Combined with Full Thoracoscopy in Patients with Radical Resection of Lung Cancer

Xue-dan LI,Rong-liang XUE,Hui WU,Jiao CHEN,Wei-guo MI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2018.20.016
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with full thoracoscopy in patients with radical resection of lung cancer. Methods: Selected 80 patients with lung cancer who were treated in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from May 2015 to May 2017, and they were divided into the control group (n=40) and the study group (n=40) according to the random number table method. The patients in two groups were treated by conventional single operation hole full thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer. The control group were received traditional perioperative treatment, while the study group were received perioperative intervention of ERAS model. The clinical indicators, the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after operation and the incidence of complications in two groups were observed and evaluated, the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) in the two groups at 1 d, 3 d and 5 d after operation were compared, and the level of C reactive protein (CRP) before operation and 3 d after operation was compared. Results: Postoperative thoracic drainage volume, postoperative the first feeding time, postoperative hospitalization days and extraction time of thoracic drainage tube in study group were all lower than those in control group (P<0.05). The incidence of SIRS and complications after operation in the study group was 0.00% and 5.00% respectively, which were lower than 15.00% and 22.50% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The scores of VAS 3 d and 5 d after operation in the two groups were lower than that of 1 d after operation, and the scores of VAS 5 d after operation in the two groups were lower than 3 d after operation (P<0.05), the scores of VAS 1 d, 3 d and 5 d after operation in the study group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the level of CRP between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). The level of 3 d CRP in the two groups was higher than that before operation, and the level of CRP in the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: For patients with radical resection of lung cancer, ERAS combined with thoracoscopy can reduce pain, reduce the levels of inflammatory factors, and reduce adverse reactions. It has good effect on early rehabilitation of patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?