Abstract:Problem Definition: As the usage of livestreaming as a shopping channel skyrocketed during Covid-19 lockdowns (especially in China), numerous brands started to leverage livestream selling to drive sales. This paper investigates a firm’s optimal livestream adoption strategies and implementation tactics and the implications of livestream adoption for influencers and consumers. Methodology/Results: We develop a game-theoretic model to understand the strategic interactions between the firm, influencer, and consumers. Our analysis yields several interesting and nontrivial insights. First, we find that livestream selling should only be adopted when the influencer can attract a considerable number of viewers (i.e., the social influence is large) and this requirement diminishes as the influencer becomes more capable of identifying the product quality accurately (i.e., the endorsement reliability is high). Second, we assert that livestream adoption needs to be accompanied by appropriate selections of both influencer and product. While a larger social influence is always preferred by the firm when selecting an influencer, a higher endorsement reliability may not be favorable. Furthermore, featuring products with a mediocre, rather than top-notch, quality can help exploit more value from livestream selling. Third, our analysis of commission fee design indicates that the influencer should be granted a reasonable revenue share because the influencer’s substantial “skin in the game” would reward the firm with more pricing flexibility. We further caution that introducing a slotting fee never benefits the firm and might even lead to a “lose-lose” outcome. Lastly, in search of good deals, it does not work for consumers to blindly follow influencers with a larger social influence or a higher endorsement reliability. Surprisingly, an increase in the influencer’s endorsement reliability can even lead to a “triple-worse” outcome for the firm, influencer, and consumers. Managerial Implications: Our paper lays out several important operational strategies firms have at their disposal to better experiment and invest in livestream selling, including pricing policy, influencer selection, product selection, and commission fee design.

Live-streaming Selling Strategies for Competitive Firms

The Impact of Live Streaming on Competitive E-Commerce

Live streaming e-commerce supply chain decisions considering dominant streamer under agency selling and reselling formats

A Model of Livestream Selling with Online Influencers

Optimal selling format considering price discount strategy in live-streaming commerce

How Livestream Selling Strategy Interacts with Product Line Design

Influencer Selection and Strategic Analysis for Live Streaming Selling

Fly with the Wings of Live-Stream Selling-Channel Strategies With/without Switching Demand

Live-streaming selling modes on a retail platform

Optimal marketing strategies for live streaming rooms in livestream e-commerce

Reselling or agency selling? The strategic role of live streaming commerce in distribution contract selection

Channel Choice in Live Streaming Commerce

Brands’ Livestream Selling with Influencers’ Converting Fans into Consumers: Game LAnalysis and Data Validation

Resale or Agency Sale? Equilibrium Analysis on the Role of Live Streaming Selling

Strategic decision making in live streaming e-commerce through tripartite evolutionary game analysis

Game-Theoretic Analysis of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on TikTok

Livestream e-commerce in a platform supply chain: A product-fit uncertainty reduction perspective

Should manufacturers open live streaming shopping channels?

The Streamer's sales strategy choice considering sales effort

Stackelberg Game Perspective on Pricing Decision of a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Live Broadcast Sales

Self-broadcasting or cooperating with streamers? A perspective on live streaming sales of fresh products