Life Cycle Thinking Supports 21st‐century New Pollutant and Chemical Management

Fan Wu,Kevin Cheng,Fei Cheng,Jing You
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4758
2023-01-01
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Abstract:Millions of chemicals are on the market; many of these pose potential human health and ecological risks that are insufficiently addressed and may be falling through the cracks of current assessment and regulatory systems. New pollutants, also known as contaminants of emerging concern, are mostly synthetic chemicals with unidentified bioactivity, unintentionally released byproducts, or transformation products. These may endanger human health and ecological systems during chemical manufacture, transportation, storage, application, and when released into the environment. On 24 May 2022, the general office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China officially issued the Action Plan for New Pollutants Treatment (Notice No. 15), which highlights chemical inspection and monitoring to accurately identify and effectively control new pollutants with high risks. Notably, one of the core objectives is that the life cycle management concept is followed to effectively prevent adverse outcomes resulting from the production and use of chemicals. In this, life cycle management was mentioned in conjunction with the control of new pollutants in government documents in China for the first time. Life cycle thinking (LCT) is a framework that considers a holistic view of a product, process, or service from production (or even from resource extraction) through consumption and use to end‐of‐life. Impacts are assessed in environmental, economic, and social terms throughout the whole life cycle. Current approaches prioritize the management of known chemicals or pollutants that are highly persistent, mobile, and bioactive. This prioritization process focuses heavily on chemicals that already have been emitted into the environment. Although effective monitoring and treatment through centralized discharge facilities enhance precise management and control of new pollutants, strengthening upstream chemical control through LCT could be a more sustainable management strategy, since most new pollutants originate from synthetic chemicals. In parallel, chemical mixtures in the environment are highly complex, so novel techniques that can identify major contaminants responsible for environmental risks are urgently needed. Tracing the identified potent pollutants back to where emitting sources occur would benefit the life cycle management of new pollutants. Herein, we propose a comprehensive two‐way (top‐down and bottom‐ up) framework that bridges LCT with risk assessment for new, holistic, pollutant control. TOP‐DOWN: TRACKING POLLUTANT FLOW NETWORK AND PRIORITIZING BY RISK RANKS The top‐down approach integrates various environmental systematic tools for new pollutants' management. For known chemicals and pollutants, the first step is revealing their material metabolism within all life stages. Chemical material flow discloses the dynamic source–flow–sink relationship in the socioeconomic system and potentially identifies exposure routes and amounts of chemicals in the environment (Cui et al., 2022). When this is further coupled with environmental fate and risk assessment models, potential risks of target chemicals and transformation products in various environmental compartments can be predicted. This approach is preferable when target chemicals contain detailed market trading and material flow data. The top‐down approach is also applicable for pollutant control in industries that share similar upstream sources and input raw materials. After compiling a set of chemicals that are applied during industrial processing chains, chemicals potentially emitted into the environment are ranked based on their toxicity, persistency, and emitted quantities; then, a priority list of new pollutants can be generated. In addition, holistic environmental impacts, including nontoxicological and nonchemically deleterious effects, could be
What problem does this paper attempt to address?