Which pollutants and sources should be prioritized for control in multi-pollutants complex contaminated areas?

Kaige Ouyang,Xiaofei Lu,Jing Meng,Chenxi Wang,Siting Feng,Bin Shi,Guijin Su,Qianqian Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135547
IF: 13.6
2024-08-19
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Abstract:Risk assessment and source identification of multi-pollutants are essential for accurate control of soil contamination. However, complexity in pollutant properties and diversity in source types raise challenges to the target. Therefore, this study constructed a hierarchical ecological risk quantification method combined with risk ranking, risk of single pollutant using potential affected fraction (PAF), and joint risk of multi-pollutants employing msPAF. Taking regional contamination in South China as a case, the risk ranking was determined, while single and joint effects showed msPAF reaching 79.4 %, with risk as heavy metals (HMs) > per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) > polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Meanwhile, an integrated source apportionment method was established from three layers by principal component analysis to classify source types, multiple linear regression of distance to identify key sources, and positive matrix factorization to track omitted sources. Consequently, key sources were captured, with 80.8 %−93.2 % contribution of farmland and electroplating to three main HMs, 52.2 %−69.4 % contribution of roads to three main PAHs, and 71.1 %−73.2 % contribution of electroplating to two main PFASs. Further, omitted sources were tracked with contribution of 31.2 %−84.1 % to eight pollutants. The established methods can identify control targets, including high-risk pollutants and their key sources.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?