Abstract:Purpose: Relaxometry, specifically T1 and T2 mapping, has become an essential technique for assessing the properties of biological tissues related to various physiological and pathological conditions. Many techniques are being used to estimate T1 and T2 relaxation times, ranging from the traditional inversion or saturation recovery and spin echo sequences to more advanced methods. Choosing the appropriate method for a specific application is critical since the precision and accuracy of T1 and T2 measurements are influenced by a variety of factors including the pulse sequence and its parameters, the inherent properties of the tissue being examined, the MRI hardware, and the image reconstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the test retest reproducibility of two advanced MRI relaxometry techniques (Driven Equilibrium Single Pulse Observation of T1 and T2, DESPOT, and 3D Quantification using an interleaved Look Locker acquisition Sequence with a T2 preparation pulse, QALAS), for T1 and T2 mapping in a healthy volunteer cohort. Methods: 10 healthy volunteers underwent brain MRI at 1.3 mm3 isotropic resolution, acquiring DESPOT and QALAS data (about 11.8 and about 5 minutes duration, including field maps, respectively), test retest with subject repositioning, on a 3.0 Tesla Philips Ingenia Elition scanner. To reconstruct the T1 and T2 maps, we used an equation based algorithm for DESPOT and a dictionary based algorithm that incorporates inversion efficiency and B1 field inhomogeneity for QALAS. The test retest reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. Results: Our results indicate that both the DESPOT and QALAS techniques demonstrate good levels of test retest reproducibility for T1 and T2 mapping across the brain. Higher whole brain voxel to voxel ICCs are observed in QALAS for T1 (0.84) and in DESPOT for T2 (0.897). The Bland Altman plots show smaller bias and variability of T1 estimates for QALAS (mean of negative 0.02 s, and upper and lower limits of negative 0.14 and 0.11 s, 95% CI) than for DESPOT (mean of negative 0.02 s, and limits of negative 0.31 and 0.27 s). QALAS also showed less variability (mean 1.08 ms, limits negative 1.88 to 4.04 ms) for T2 compared to DESPOT (mean of 2.56 ms, and limits negative 17.29 to 22.41 ms). The within subject CoVs for QALAS range from 0.6% (T2 in CSF) to 5.8% (T2 in GM), while for DESPOT they range from 2.1% (T2 in CSF) to 6.7% (T2 in GM). The between subject CoVs for QALAS range from 2.5% (T2 in GM) to 12% (T2 in CSF), and for DESPOT they range from 3.7% (T2 in WM) to 9.3% (T2 in CSF). Conclusion: Overall, QALAS demonstrated better reproducibility for T1 and T2 measurements than DESPOT, in addition to reduced acquisition time.

Repeatability and Accuracy of MR-STAT Quantitative T1 and T2 Measurements

Abstract WP292: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Reliably Measuring Hematoma Volume in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Three-dimensional Simultaneous Brain Mapping of T1, T2, T2*and Magnetic Susceptibility with MR Multitasking

A three-dimensional MR-STAT protocol for high-resolution multi-parametric quantitative MRI

High resolution in-vivo MR-STAT using a matrix-free and parallelized reconstruction algorithm

Brain Parcellation Repeatability and Reproducibility Using Conventional and Quantitative 3D MR Imaging

Improving the reliability of T2 measurement in magnetic resonance imaging

Repeat it without me: Crowdsourcing the T1 mapping common ground via the ISMRM reproducibility challenge

Comparison of T2 Quantification Strategies in the Abdominal-Pelvic Region for Clinical Use

Comparison and calibration of MP2RAGE quantitative T1 values to multi-TI inversion recovery T1 values

Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D‐MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases

3D MR-STAT: Towards a Fast Multi-Parametric Protocol with Increased SNR

Repeatability of Quantitative Knee Cartilage T1, T2, and T1ρ Mapping With 3D-MRI Fingerprinting

Time-efficient, high-resolution 3T whole-brain relaxometry using Cartesian 3D MR-STAT with CSF suppression

Assessment of accuracy and repeatability of quantitative parameter mapping in MRI

Correcting for T1 bias in Magnetization Transfer Saturation (MTsat) Maps Using Sparse-MP2RAGE

Repeatability of quantitative MR fingerprinting for T1 and T2 measurements of metastatic bone in prostate cancer patients

Time‐efficient, high‐resolution 3T whole‐brain relaxometry using Cartesian 3D MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time‐Domain (MR‐STAT) with cerebrospinal fluid suppression

Comparison of test-retest reproducibility of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for water T1 and T2 mapping

High SNR full brain relaxometry at 7T by accelerated MR‐STAT

Statistical estimation of T1 relaxation times using conventional magnetic resonance imaging