Abstract:In recent years, there has been increasing interest in causal reasoning for designing fair decision-making systems due to its compatibility with legal frameworks, interpretability for human stakeholders, and robustness to spurious correlations inherent in observational data, among other factors. The recent attention to causal fairness, however, has been accompanied with great skepticism due to practical and epistemological challenges with applying current causal fairness approaches in the literature. Motivated by the long-standing empirical work on causality in econometrics, social sciences, and biomedical sciences, in this paper we lay out the conditions for appropriate application of causal fairness under the "potential outcomes framework." We highlight key aspects of causal inference that are often ignored in the causal fairness literature. In particular, we discuss the importance of specifying the nature and timing of interventions on social categories such as race or gender. Precisely, instead of postulating an intervention on immutable attributes, we propose a shift in focus to their perceptions and discuss the implications for fairness evaluation. We argue that such conceptualization of the intervention is key in evaluating the validity of causal assumptions and conducting sound causal analysis including avoiding post-treatment bias. Subsequently, we illustrate how causality can address the limitations of existing fairness metrics, including those that depend upon statistical correlations. Specifically, we introduce causal variants of common statistical notions of fairness, and we make a novel observation that under the causal framework there is no fundamental disagreement between different notions of fairness. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments where we demonstrate our approach for evaluating and mitigating unfairness, specially when post-treatment variables are present.

Causality-based Fair Multiple Decision by Response Functions

A Review of Causality-Based Fairness Machine Learning

Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions

Multi-cause Discrimination Analysis Using Potential Outcomes.

Causality-Aided Trade-off Analysis for Machine Learning Fairness

Causal Discovery and Causal Inference Based Counterfactual Fairness in Machine Learning

Promises and Challenges of Causality for Ethical Machine Learning

Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data

Counterfactually Fair Representation

Cross-model Fairness: Empirical Study of Fairness and Ethics Under Model Multiplicity

Counterfactually Fair Regression with Double Machine Learning

Causal Discovery for Fairness

Taking Advantage of Multitask Learning for Fair Classification

Counterfactual Fair Opportunity: Measuring Decision Model Fairness with Counterfactual Reasoning

Causality-Inspired Fair Representation Learning for Multimodal Recommendation

Group Fairness by Probabilistic Modeling with Latent Fair Decisions

Fair Risk Minimization under Causal Path-Specific Effect Constraints

Approximating Discrimination Within Models When Faced With Several Non-Binary Sensitive Attributes

Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach

Causal Fairness under Unobserved Confounding: A Neural Sensitivity Framework

Mind the Gap: A Causal Perspective on Bias Amplification in Prediction & Decision-Making