Abstract:Purpose Heterogeneous risk disclosure has been proven to improve the efficiency of new stock issuance, but excessive risk disclosure during the IPO may lead to irrational underestimation of the company, which is different from the original intention of management's detailed disclosure. Therefore, this study aims to examine the impact of IPO heterogeneous risk disclosure on earnings management motivations from the information transfer perspective of earnings management. Design/methodology/approach The sample includes 2,000 listed companies listed firms on Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2007 to 2022. This study uses the pretrained ERNIE model to measure text similarity in the prospectus to measure the heterogeneity of IPO risk disclosure. Findings This study empirically finds that heterogeneous IPO risk disclosure suppresses the opportunistic motivation of earnings management because managers tend to use earnings management to leverage information transmission functions. Such an effect is more pronounced in firms with higher analyst attention, lower marketization levels and non-state-owned. And heterogeneous risk disclosure may inhibit management’s over-investment behavior, thereby reducing the possibility of management engaging in opportunistic earnings management. Besides, price discounts are used to distinguish opportunistic and non-opportunistic earnings management and carry out a quasi-natural experimental design to demonstrate that marketization can enhance the relationship between heterogeneous risk disclosure and earnings management. Originality/value This study contributes evidence regarding the economic consequences of managerial earnings management behavior related to heterogeneous IPO risk disclosure. It supports highlighted firms in the IPO risk information disclosure to mitigate potential adverse outcomes through earnings management. This contributes to the literature and enhances information transparency in the capital market, fostering the healthy development of China’s capital market.

Rhetorical Management of Liability of Foreignness in Capital Market

Fleeing from Systemic Risk at Home Through Cross-Border Acquisitions

Do Foreign Firms in China Incur A Liability of Foreignness? the Local Chinese Firms' Perspective

Dual liability and the moderating effect of corporate social responsibility–Evidence from Belt&Road investment of Chinese firms

Heterogeneous risk disclosure and earnings management motivation: evidence from China’s IPO market

The effects of risk factor disclosure on analysts’ earnings forecasts: evidence from Chinese IPOs

Risk disclosure and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Risk Perceptions and Risk Management Approaches of Chinese Overseas Investors: An Empirical Investigation

Analysis of ESG information-disclosure strategies considering different risk-appetite investors

To protect or to hide-an investigation on corporate redacted disclosure motives under new FAST act regulation

Do investors and analysts value strategic corporate social responsibility disclosures? Evidence from China

Disclosure for whom? Government involvement, CSR disclosure and firm value

Ownership Structure, Institutional Environment, and the Economic Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

How does liability of origin influence cross-border acquisition completion? Evidence from Chinese firms

Empirical Study on Chinese Corporate Risk Management

The path to overcoming the liability of foreignness using the eclectic paradigm: evidence from China

Risk factors disclosure and corporate philanthropy

Corporate ownership, equity risk and returns in the People's Republic of China

Economic policy uncertainty and voluntary disclosures:How do Chinese firms respond?

Does more voluntary environmental information disclosure cut down the cost of equity: heavy pollution industries in China

Does CSR Information Disclosure Improve Investment Efficiency? The Moderating Role of Analyst Attention