Abstract:PurposeBased on the linkage-leverage-learning (LLL) framework developed by Mathews (2006), the purpose of this paper is to examine how linking, leveraging and learning capabilities influence the choice of foreign-entry mode, and the way such influences are contingent on context factors in the emerging markets.Design/methodology/approachContrary to a prior literature applying the LLL framework, which mainly used case studies, this paper adopts a quantitative approach and is based on a sample of 321 Chinese listed companies to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe results show that multinational firms from emerging markets (EMFs) with stronger LLL capabilities are more likely to choose the wholly owned mode in foreign entries. In addition, the relationship between linking capability and wholly owned entry mode choice is weaker at higher levels of cultural distance between home and host country. At the same time, the relationship between learning capability and wholly owned entry mode choice is weaker at higher levels of cultural distance between home and host country, and of institutional distance between prior entries and the focal entry.Research limitations/implicationsAn entry mode strategy for firms without ownership advantages and the identification of boundary conditions for applying different LLL capabilities are recommended. The generalizability of the findings from a single-country setting still needs further validation with other emerging economies.Originality/valueThis paper treats internationalization of firms from emerging countries with a different perspective. The underlying idea in this study is that internationalization is not only a process for EMFs to utilize externally accessible assets abroad, but also a process of simultaneously combining internationalization with experiential learning and capability utilization in overseas markets. In addition, the authors also contribute to the literature by providing strong empirical evidence for validating the LLL model and extending the existing entry mode studies.

How does liability of origin influence cross-border acquisition completion? Evidence from Chinese firms

How Does Foreign Acquirers’ ESG Misbehaviour Exposure Affect the Completion of Cross‐Border Acquisitions?

Fleeing from Systemic Risk at Home Through Cross-Border Acquisitions

Do Foreign Firms in China Incur A Liability of Foreignness? the Local Chinese Firms' Perspective

Dual liability and the moderating effect of corporate social responsibility–Evidence from Belt&Road investment of Chinese firms

How Do Linking, Leveraging and Learning Capabilities Influence the Entry Mode Choice for Multinational Firms from Emerging Markets?

The path to overcoming the liability of foreignness using the eclectic paradigm: evidence from China

Do indigenous firms incur a liability of localness when operating in their home market? The case of China

Overcoming the Liability of Origin: Cross-Listing in Developed Economies As a Signal

The Liability of Foreignness and Operational Security: Evidence from Emerging Markets

Does negative political coverage affect the completion of cross-border mergers and acquisitions—Evidence from BRICS in the US market

The liability of opaqueness: State ownership and the likelihood of deal completion in international acquisitions by Chinese firms

Do Chinese firms benefit from government ownership following cross-border acquisitions?

Chinese MNE Acquisition of Unrelated Foreign Businesses: the Role of Diversified Business Group Affiliation, Private Ownership and Strategic Asset Seeking

Long‐term orientation and outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

An Integration of Premium and Liability of Foreignness

Overcoming the liability of outsidership for emerging market MNEs: A capability-building perspective

Success in Completing Cross‐border Acquisitions by Emerging Market Firms: What Matters?

State Ownership and Cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

Ethics and the Liability of Foreignness: the Case of China

Country of Origin Effects in Capital Structure Decisions: Evidence from Foreign Direct Investments in China