The Flood Footprint Analysis: A Proposal

David Mendoza-Tinoco,Alfonso Mercado-Garcia,Dabo Guan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29728-1_3

2023-01-01

Abstract:The rationale of the standard flood footprint analysis (FFA) is disclosed in detail in this chapter. This analysis is proposed to comprehensively include both direct and indirect costs arising from a disaster.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Multiregional Flood Footprint Analysis

David Mendoza-Tinoco,Alfonso Mercado-Garcia,Dabo Guan

2023-01-01

Abstract:This SpringerBrief presents a novel methodology for comprehensive account of total economic costs from natural disasters.
Flood Footprint Assessment: a New Approach for Flood-Induced Indirect Economic Impact Measurement and Post-Flood Recovery

Zhao Zeng,Dabo Guan,Albert E. Steenge,Yang Xia,David Mendoza-Tinoco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124204

IF: 6.4

2019-01-01

Journal of Hydrology

Abstract:Flooding in one location can impact the entire production chain of a regional economy. Neglecting the knock-on costs of this risks ignoring the economic benefits and beneficiaries of flood risk management interventions. However, economic consequence assessments in the existing studies are restricted to direct economic impact as there is not a generally accepted quantitative method to assess indirect economic impacts. This paper presents the full methodology for a novel flood footprint accounting framework - the Flood Footprint Model - to assess the indirect economic impact of a flood event and simulate post-flood economic recovery situations throughout productions supply chains. Within the framework of Input-Output (IO) analysis, the model is built upon previous contributions, with improvements regarding the optimization of available production imbalances; the requirements for recovering damaged capital; and an optimized rationing scheme, including basic demand and reconstruction requirements. The Flood Footprint Model will be applied in a hypothetical example with an extensive sensitivity analysis of the Flood Footprint Model performed, taking particular account of alternative labour and capital recovery paths.
Methodology and application of flood footprint accounting in a hypothetical multiple two-flood event

Zhao Zeng,Dabo Guan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0209

2020-04-03

Abstract:Multiple natural disasters are becoming ever more frequent around the world, with both climate change and rapid urbanization increasing the risk of such disasters in human society. Comprehensive analysis of the economic impact of multiple disasters on the industrial and economic system has become an urgent and essential part of urban recovery and sustainable development. However, there is a lack of studies that focus on assessing the indirect economic impacts resulting from such multiple events, and thereafter providing a common quantitative approach within their assessment. With the concept of flood footprint and input-output theory, this study proposes a more externally oriented methodology (flood footprint model) for indirect flood footprint (IFF) accounting and offers various extensive sensitivity analyses based on a hypothetical two-flood event. Based on the two-flood case, we conclude that the total flood footprint of a multi-flood within a given region is larger than the sum of individual flood footprints and this is the same for the IFF due to the combination effect, while the flood footprint is highly constrained by factors such as occurrence time and physical damage caused by the ensuing disaster. This article is part of the theme issue 'Urban flood resilience'.
Flood Footprint of the 2007 Floods in the UK: the Case of the Yorkshire and the Humber Region

David Mendoza-Tinoco,Dabo Guan,Zhao Zeng,Yang Xia,Ana Serrano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.016

IF: 11.1

2017-01-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:International headlines over the last few years have been dominated by extreme weather events, and floods have been amongst the most frequent and devastating. These disasters represent high costs and functional disruptions to societies and economies. The consequent breakdown of the economic equilibrium exacerbates the losses of the initial physical damages and generates indirect costs that largely amplify the burden of the total damage. Neglecting indirect damages results in misleading results regarding the real dimensions of the costs and prevents accurate decision-making in flood risk management. To obtain an accurate assessment of total flooding costs, this paper introduces the flood footprint concept, as a novel accounting framework that measures the total economic impact that is directly and indirectly caused to the productive system, triggered by the flooding damages to the productive factors, infrastructure and residential capital. The assessment framework account for the damages in the flooded region as well as in wider economic systems and social networks. The flood footprint builds on previous research on disaster impact analysis based on Input-Output methodology, which considers inter-industry flows of goods and services for economic output. The framework was applied to the 2007 summer floods in the UK to determine the total economic impact in the region of Yorkshire and The Humber. The results suggest that the total economic burden of the floods was approximately 4% of the region's GVA (£2.7 billion), from which over half comes from knock-on effects during the 14 months that the economy of Yorkshire and The Humber last to recover. This paper is the first to apply the conceptual framework of flood footprint to a real past event, by which it highlights the economic interdependence among industrial sectors. Through such interrelationships, the economic impacts of a flooding event spill over into the entire economic system, and some of the most affected sectors can be those that are not directly damaged. Neglecting the impact of indirect damages would underestimate the total social costs of flooding events, and mislead the correspondent actions for risk management and adaptation.
FloodSafeHome: evaluating financial benefits and savings of freeboard for improved decision-making in flood risk mitigation

Carol J. Friedland,Yong-Cheol Lee,Rubayet Bin Mostafiz,Jiyoung Lee,Shifat P. Mithila,Robert V. Rohli,Ehab Gnan,Monica Teets Farris,Md Adilur Rahim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1060901

2023-05-11

Frontiers in Communication

Abstract:Freeboard—elevation of a structure above the base flood elevation (BFE)—is a critical component in mitigating or avoiding flood losses. However, the unrevealed benefits and savings of freeboard installation have prevented communities from adopting this approach. To improve decision-making for residents, prospective residents, and other stakeholders in flood-vulnerable communities and enhance flood risk mitigation strategies, this study presents the methodology underlying a new webtool, FloodSafeHome, that estimates comprehensively the economic benefits and savings of freeboard installation for new construction of residential buildings. Specifically, the proposed evaluation framework has been designed to calculate monthly savings for individual buildings by assessing freeboard cost, insurance savings per year, and expected annual flood loss. This new evaluation method is built into a web-based, decision-making tool for use by the public and community leaders in three southeastern Louisiana parishes (i.e., counties), to identify expected future benefits of building residences with freeboard and enhance their decision-making processes with interactive risk/benefit analysis features. For example, results indicate the levels of freeboard that optimize the cost-benefit ratio for flood-insured homes in the study area. This approach is expected to improve long-term flood resilience and provide cost-efficient flood mitigation strategies, particularly in disaster vulnerable regions.
Flood Footprint Assessment: A Multiregional Case of 2009 Central European Floods

David Mendoza-Tinoco,Yixin Hu,Zhao Zeng,Konstantinos J. Chalvatzis,Ning Zhang,Albert E. Steenge,Dabo Guan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13497

2020-01-01

Risk Analysis

Abstract:Hydrometeorological phenomena have increased in intensity and frequency in last decades, with Europe as one of the most affected areas. This accounts for considerable economic losses in the region. Regional adaptation strategies for costs minimization require a comprehensive assessment of the disasters' economic impacts at a multiple-region scale. This article adapts the flood footprint method for multiple-region assessment of total economic impact and applies it to the 2009 Central European Floods event. The flood footprint is an impact accounting framework based on the input-output methodology to economically assess the physical damage (direct) and production shortfalls (indirect) within a region and wider economic networks, caused by a climate disaster. Here, the model is extended through the capital matrix, to enable diverse recovery strategies. According to the results, indirect losses represent a considerable proportion of the total costs of a natural disaster, and most of them occur in nonhighly directly impacted industries. For the 2009 Central European Floods, the indirect losses represent 65% out of total, and 70% of it comes from four industries: business services, manufacture general, construction, and commerce. Additionally, results show that more industrialized economies would suffer more indirect losses than less-industrialized ones, in spite of being less vulnerable to direct shocks. This may link to their specific economic structures of high capital-intensity and strong interindustrial linkages.
Evaluation of Flood-Vulnerable Pavement Network in Support of Resilience in Pavement System Management

Feng Hong,Hui Wu,Jenny Li,Elizabeth Paul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231156934

IF: 1.7

2023-03-16

Transportation Research Record

Abstract:Transportation Research Record, Ahead of Print. Transportation systems play a pivotal role in the nation's economic and societal development. Transportation assets, such as pavements and bridges, are inevitably subject to the effects of climate and environment. These stressors mainly include flood, precipitation, heat, wildfire, and wind. Specifically, more extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and snowstorms, have occurred in recent years. This requires stakeholders to better prepare transportation infrastructure resilience in planning, design, construction, and management. Its importance is manifested through nationwide policy and state-level practice. For example, in Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the FHWA directs all state DOTs to incorporate resilience in their transportation asset management plans. A critical element in resilience is to evaluate the effect of climatic or environmental stressors on facilities' performance. This study examines the impact of flood on the TxDOT-managed pavement network. It proposes a method to evaluate the flood-vulnerable pavement network in the context of resilience. First, the GIS tool is used to overlap a 100-year frequency flood with the road network to identify weak pavement sections subject to flood risk. Second, a simulation is run to determine sections affected by flood over a 10-year analysis horizon. Then, different deterioration models are used to predict the network-level pavement performance, to reflect (1) normal deterioration without flood, (2) optimistic accelerated deterioration under flooding, and (3) pessimistic accelerated deterioration under flooding. It is found that the network-level pavement will experience varying levels of performance reduction, owing to a 100-year flood impact. The quantified performance change can serve to enhance infrastructure resilience preparation for more reliable pavement system management.
Comparison of estimated flood exposure and consequences generated by different event-based inland flood inundation maps

Joseph L. Gutenson,Ahmad A. Tavakoly,Mohammad S. Islam,Oliver E. J. Wing,William P. Lehman,Chase O. Hamilton,Mark D. Wahl,T. Christopher Massey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-261-2023

IF: 4.58

2023-01-21

Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Abstract:The flooding brought about by compound coastal flooding events can be devastating. Before, during, and immediately following these events, flood inundation maps (FIMs) can provide essential information to emergency management. However, there are a number of frameworks capable of estimating FIMs during flood events. In this article, we evaluate FIMs derived from three such frameworks in the context of Hurricane Harvey. Our analysis reveals that each of the three FIM frameworks provides different FIMs that differ in their level of accuracy. Each of the three FIMs also produces different exposure and consequence estimates because of their spatial differences. This investigation highlights the need for a centralized means of vetting and adjudicating multiple FIMs during compound flood events empowered by the ability to distribute FIMs as geographic information system (GIS) services and coalesce FIMs into a common operating picture. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the ability to produce multi-model estimates of FIMs to create probabilistic FIMs may provide a better product than the use of a lone FIM.
Flood footprint modelling to evaluate the flood risk management benefits of blue–green infrastructure

David Mendoza-Tinoco,Dabo Guan,Richard Fenner,Colin Thorne,Emily O’Donnell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/bgc.64195.133

2020-01-01

Abstract:Sustainable development relies on the capacity of communities to adapt to climate change and the natural disasters related to it. Primary among these in many regions of the world is the increasing frequency of prolonged, intense rainfall that drives surface water flooding. Given that more than half of the global population now lives in cities, and that this proportion is increasing, developing new adaptation strategies for urban stormwater infrastructure requires urgent attention. Cities in the UK have long been vulnerable to surface water and coincident flooding, but piped drainage infrastructure built in the Victorian era is well beyond its design life and has insufficient capacity to cope with modern rainstorms. Replacing such grey systems like-for-like, requires ever-larger pipes and underground storage tanks, making this an option affordable only in the largest metropolitan areas. Also, in terms of cost-benefit analysis …
A practice-oriented framework for stationary and nonstationary flood frequency analysis

Cuauhtémoc Tonatiuh Vidrio-Sahagún,Jake Ruschkowski,Jianxun He,Alain Pietroniro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105940

IF: 5.471

2024-01-05

Environmental Modelling & Software

Abstract:In flood frequency analysis (FFA), choices of distribution and methods can hinder the reproducibility of results. Besides, changes in climate, land use/cover, and water management can induce nonstationarity. Frameworks to select between stationary FFA (S-FFA) and nonstationary FFA (NS-FFA) are lacking, and NS-FFA tools are limited. Therefore, this paper introduces a systematic and software-supported framework enabling repeatable workflows for both S-FFA and NS-FFA. The framework has three modules to: a) process flood series for exploratory data analysis (EDA) and NS-FFA model determination (if needed), b) select the S-FFA or NS-FFA approach underpinned by the EDA, and c) perform FFA including model determination, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and model performance assessment. The framework incorporates various distributions, methods, and metrics, and recent advancements in NS-FFA for model determination and uncertainty quantification and allows for the modeller's intervention while ensuring reproducibility. The software is freely available to the public.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,water resources,computer science, interdisciplinary applications
Theoretical Boundaries of Annual Flood Risk for Single-Family Homes Within the 100-Year Floodplain

Ayat Al Assi,Rubayet Bin Mostafiz,Carol J. Friedland,Robert V. Rohli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00577-7

2024-03-16

International Journal of Environmental Research

Abstract:Special flood hazard areas (SFHAs), defined as having an annual probability of occurrence of 1 percent or above, are used by U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to demarcate areas within which flood insurance purchase is required to secure a mortgage. However, quantifying flood risk within SFHAs can be challenging due to the lack of modeled flood depth data for all return periods. To address this issue, this research quantifies flood risk indicated by average annual loss (AAL) within the A Zone—the subset of the SFHA where wave heights can potentially range from 0 to 3 feet. The methodology resolves the Gumbel quantile function for four distinct flooding cases (i.e., locations flooded at return periods exceeding 1.58-, 10-, 25-, and 50-year return period events) and generates synthetic flood hazard parameters for these cases within the 100-year floodplain, as well as with additional elevation above the base flood elevation (BFE), known as freeboard, for single-family homes with different attributes. The results indicate that for single-family homes in the A Zone, with the lowest floor elevated to the BFE, the AAL ranges from 0.3 to 1 percent of the building replacement cost value. Adding one foot of freeboard reduces flood risk by over 90% if the annual flood risk is between the minimum and 25th percentiles and the 100-year flood depth is less than two feet. The demonstrated approach helps enhance flood resilience in the A Zone, demonstrating the feasibility of proactive measures to protect communities.

environmental sciences
FRESF model: An ArcGIS toolbox for rapid assessment of the supply, demand, and flow of flood regulation ecosystem services

Kunyuan Wanghe,Xinle Guo,Shahid Ahmad,Fei Tian,Ghulam Nabi,Ivan Igorevich Strelnikov,Kemao Li,Kai Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109264

IF: 6.9

2022-10-01

Ecological Indicators

Abstract:River floods are globally the most damaging and costliest natural disasters. The functions of nonstructural flood mitigation measures (e.g., water retention by vegetation and soil) provide critical regulation ecosystem services to human beings. For example, the Sponge Cities are national watershed management projects in China to increase the nonstructural flood regulation services, aiming to enable the urban ecosystem to absorb, infiltrate, and retain storm water to mitigate pluvial flooding. Decision-makers need to acquire critical areas for the supply, demand, and flow of flood regulation ecosystem services, which would affect the delivery of services and the distribution of any benefits among stakeholders. However, relatively few empirical studies present this information. One reason is the lack of appropriate methods and tools for a rapid assessment of flood regulation ecosystem services that do not require substantial resources or rely heavily on hydrological process data. This article presents the Flood Regulation Ecosystem Service Flow (FRESF) model to address this gap. FRESF is an open-access and open-source ArcGIS script toolbox for an integrated evaluation of flood regulation ecosystem services' supply, demand, and flow. Based on a land surface process model and a generic framework quantifying ecosystem services flow, FRESF provides a rapid and serviceable assessment framework for the relevant ecosystem services at a relatively low cost and effort. The validation results suggest that the outputs are moderately consistent with the actual flood conditions, compared with the flood disaster of the Yangtze River in 2020. Its open codes and flexible inputs imply that ecologists, planners, decision-makers, and developers involved in ecosystem services would have the opportunity to test and apply the FRESF model in several contexts and even contribute further improvements.

environmental sciences
Community Flood Impacts and Infrastructure: Examining National Flood Impacts Using a High Precision Assessment Tool in the United States

Jeremy R. Porter,Evelyn Shu,Michael Amodeo,Ho Hsieh,Ziyan Chu,Neil Freeman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13213125

IF: 3.53

2021-11-05

Water

Abstract:Changing environmental conditions are driving worsening flood events, with consequences for counties, cities, towns, and local communities. To understand individual flood risk within this changing climate, local community resiliency and infrastructure impacts must also be considered. Past research has attempted to capture this but has faced several limitations. This study provides a nation-wide model of community flooding impacts within the United States currently and in 30 years through the use of high-resolution input data (parcel-level), multi-source flood hazard information (four major flood types), multi-return period hazard information (six return periods), operational threshold integration, and future-facing projections. Impacts are quantified here as the level of flooding relative to operational thresholds. This study finds that over the next 30 years, millions of additional properties will be impacted, as aspects of risk are expected to increase for residential properties by 10%, roads by 3%, commercial properties by 7%, critical infrastructure facilities by 6%, and social infrastructure facilities by 9%. Additionally, certain counties and cities persistently display impact patterns. A high-resolution model capturing aspects of flood risk as related to community infrastructure is important for an understanding of overall community risk.

environmental sciences,water resources
Flood economic assessment of structural measure based on integrated flood risk management: A case study in Beijing

Hao Wang,Jinjun Zhou,Ying Tang,Zilong Liu,Aiqing Kang,Bin Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111701

IF: 8.7

2021-02-01

Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract:<p>Flood disasters have appeared more frequently in recent years because of climate change and urbanization, and Integrated Flood Risk Management (IFRM) has emerged as an effective method to reduce damage from these floods. This research studies IFRM methods in three aspects: flood risk identification of high-risk areas, flood risk assessment to quantify economic losses, and flood risk management to identify structural measures with the greatest engineering benefits. These methods were applied to Beijing as a case study, and the results showed that the Zuoan-Road area was a high-risk area with economic losses ranging from 0.7 million to 35.9 million euros over different return periods. There are five structural measures in Zuoan-Road area, with engineering benefits ranging from 0.97 to 1.60 over different return periods, and the one with the greatest engineering benefits had a fifty-year return period. The results of this research can be used to support urban flood risk management in Beijing.</p>

environmental sciences
Qualitative investigations into floodways under extreme flood loading

Isaac Samuel Greene,Chamila Gunasekara,Weena Lokuge,Warna Karunasena

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12967

2024-02-07

Journal of Flood Risk Management

Abstract:The Australian use of the term floodway refers to a trafficable transverse structure designed to facilitate the safe crossing of watercourses. Floodways are also commonly referred to as fords and causeways. This research explores areas of focus through experimental, numerical and survey methods to improve floodway resilience with regard to flood risk management. The industry‐based survey provides a dataset relating to user experiences, deduces the likeliness of floodways to sustain damage, defines several key focus areas, and reveals that the current risk levels are primarily managed without significant investigation into design. A floodway experimental and numerical simulation program was developed to investigate the lateral forces induced through debris impact using scaled models in a soil box and finite element analysis. Qualitatively, crack propagation and displacement correlated closely with the strain concentrations and displacements in the numerical simulation, with failure attributed to tensile strength being exceeded, followed by plastic strain development within the soil elements. It was concluded through this research that floodway failure during flood is complex and can be attributed to several different failure modes including concrete failure, yielding of adjoining soil material, and hydraulically via scour.

environmental sciences,water resources
Extreme Flood Disasters: Comprehensive Impact and Assessment

Qian Yu,Yanyan Wang,Na Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081211

IF: 3.53

2022-04-09

Water

Abstract:Evaluating extreme flood disasters is a prerequisite for decision making in flood management. Existing extreme flood disaster assessments fail to either consider or evaluate comprehensive impacts from social, economic, and environmental aspects. This study first analyzes the causes of extreme flood disasters and subsequently the potential flood consequences in depth. On the basis of this comprehensive analysis, an extreme flood disaster indicator system is developed by taking into account social, economic, and environmental consequences. To assess the comprehensive impacts, we propose a refined social and economic impact evaluation method and a semi-quantitative environmental impact evaluation method, which are applied to Jingjiang Flood Diversion District (JFDD) located in the Yangtze River Basin, and analyze two extreme flood scenarios. The results show that almost all of the JFDD area is flooded with inundation areas of 901.36 km2 and 879.49 km2, respectively. The corresponding affected populations are 0.51 million and 0.5 million. The direct economic losses are 18.83 billion and 14.33 billion, respectively. Moreover, 5 potential pollutant sources and 11 protected areas are inundated under two scenarios. Extreme floods have relatively serious impacts on local ecology and the environment. The proposed methodology can provide effective support for decision makers.

environmental sciences,water resources
Quantitative flood hazard assessment methods: A review

Andrea Maranzoni,Marco D'Oria,Carmine Rizzo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12855

2022-10-21

Journal of Flood Risk Management

Abstract:Flood hazard assessment is a fundamental step in flood risk mapping. Quantitative assessment requires hydrodynamic modelling of the flooding process in order to calculate the spatial distribution of suitable flood hazard indicators representative of flooding intensity and frequency, hence its potential to result in harm. Flood hazard indicators are usually defined by combining relevant flooding parameters, mainly flood depth and flow velocity, but also flooding arrival time, flooding duration, sediment or contamination load, and so forth. A flood hazard classification is commonly introduced to assign a hazard level to areas potentially subject to flooding. This article presents a systematic review of quantitative methods proposed in the scientific literature or prescribed by government authorities to assess the hazard associated with natural or anthropic flooding. Flood hazard classification methods are listed and compared by specifying their underlying approach (heuristic, conceptual, empirical), the exposed element which they were designed for (people, buildings, vehicles, etc.), and their fields of application (river overflow, dam‐break, levee breach, debris flow). Perspectives and future challenges in quantitative flood hazard analysis are also discussed. This review aims to help modellers and practitioners to select the most suitable flood hazard assessment method for the case study of interest.

environmental sciences,water resources
A data-driven spatial approach to characterize the flood hazard

Rubayet Bin Mostafiz,Md Adilur Rahim,Carol J Friedland,Robert V Rohli,Nazla Bushra,Fatemeh Orooji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.1022900

2022-12-12

Abstract:Model output of localized flood grids are useful in characterizing flood hazards for properties located in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA-areas expected to experience a 1% or greater annual chance of flooding). However, due to the unavailability of higher return-period [i.e., recurrence interval, or the reciprocal of the annual exceedance probability (AEP)] flood grids, the flood risk of properties located outside the SFHA cannot be quantified. Here, we present a method to estimate flood hazards that are located both inside and outside the SFHA using existing AEP surfaces. Flood hazards are characterized by the Gumbel extreme value distribution to project extreme flood event elevations for which an entire area is assumed to be submerged. Spatial interpolation techniques impute flood elevation values and are used to estimate flood hazards for areas outside the SFHA. The proposed method has the potential to improve the assessment of flood risk for properties located both inside and outside the SFHA and therefore to improve the decision-making process regarding flood insurance purchases, mitigation strategies, and long-term planning for enhanced resilience to one of the world's most ubiquitous natural hazards.
A Framework for Flood Risk Analysis and Benefit Assessment of Flood Control Measures in Urban Areas

Chaochao Li,Xiaotao Cheng,Na Li,Xiaohe Du,Qian Yu,Guangyuan Kan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080787

IF: 4.614

2016-08-05

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Flood risk analysis is more complex in urban areas than that in rural areas because of their closely packed buildings, different kinds of land uses, and large number of flood control works and drainage systems. The purpose of this paper is to propose a practical framework for flood risk analysis and benefit assessment of flood control measures in urban areas. Based on the concept of disaster risk triangle (hazard, vulnerability and exposure), a comprehensive analysis method and a general procedure were proposed for urban flood risk analysis. Urban Flood Simulation Model (UFSM) and Urban Flood Damage Assessment Model (UFDAM) were integrated to estimate the flood risk in the Pudong flood protection area (Shanghai, China). S-shaped functions were adopted to represent flood return period and damage (R-D) curves. The study results show that flood control works could significantly reduce the flood risk within the 66-year flood return period and the flood risk was reduced by 15.59%. However, the flood risk was only reduced by 7.06% when the flood return period exceeded 66-years. Hence, it is difficult to meet the increasing demands for flood control solely relying on structural measures. The R-D function is suitable to describe the changes of flood control capacity. This frame work can assess the flood risk reduction due to flood control measures, and provide crucial information for strategy development and planning adaptation.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities

William Mobley,Kayode O. Atoba,Wesley E. Highfield

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052098

IF: 3.9

2020-03-09

Sustainability

Abstract:Adopting effective flood mitigation practices for repetitive flood events in the United States continues to play a prominent role in preventing future damage and fostering resilience to residential flooding. Two common mitigation practices for reducing residential flood risk consist of raising an existing structure to or above base flood elevation (BFE) and acquiring chronically damaged properties in flood prone areas and restoring them back to serve their natural functions as green open spaces. However, due to data accuracy limitations, decision makers are faced with the challenge of identifying the financially optimal approach to implementing mitigation measures. We address this problem through the following research questions: What does the optimal allocation of flood mitigation resources look like under data uncertainty, and what are the optimal methods to combining mitigation measures with consideration for the best economic benefits? Using a robust decision making (RDM) approach, the effects of uncertainty in property values, construction and demolition costs, and policy implementation options such as structure selection and budget allocation were measured. Our results indicate that the amount budgeted for mitigation and how those funds are allocated directly influence the selection of the most economically viable mitigation practices. Our research also contributes to the growing need for evaluating specific flood mitigation strategies.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

The Flood Footprint Analysis: A Proposal

Multiregional Flood Footprint Analysis

Flood Footprint Assessment: a New Approach for Flood-Induced Indirect Economic Impact Measurement and Post-Flood Recovery

Methodology and application of flood footprint accounting in a hypothetical multiple two-flood event

Flood Footprint of the 2007 Floods in the UK: the Case of the Yorkshire and the Humber Region

FloodSafeHome: evaluating financial benefits and savings of freeboard for improved decision-making in flood risk mitigation

Flood Footprint Assessment: A Multiregional Case of 2009 Central European Floods

Evaluation of Flood-Vulnerable Pavement Network in Support of Resilience in Pavement System Management

Comparison of estimated flood exposure and consequences generated by different event-based inland flood inundation maps

Flood footprint modelling to evaluate the flood risk management benefits of blue–green infrastructure

A practice-oriented framework for stationary and nonstationary flood frequency analysis

Theoretical Boundaries of Annual Flood Risk for Single-Family Homes Within the 100-Year Floodplain

FRESF model: An ArcGIS toolbox for rapid assessment of the supply, demand, and flow of flood regulation ecosystem services

Community Flood Impacts and Infrastructure: Examining National Flood Impacts Using a High Precision Assessment Tool in the United States

Flood economic assessment of structural measure based on integrated flood risk management: A case study in Beijing

Qualitative investigations into floodways under extreme flood loading

Extreme Flood Disasters: Comprehensive Impact and Assessment

Quantitative flood hazard assessment methods: A review

A data-driven spatial approach to characterize the flood hazard

A Framework for Flood Risk Analysis and Benefit Assessment of Flood Control Measures in Urban Areas

Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities