≪p Class="Bbauthorname"><Span Lang="En-Us">Phosphorescence Lifetime Measurements with Sensor Materials: Comparison of the Four Different Detection Platforms<O:P></O:P></Span></P>

Rajannya Sen,Liang Li,Alexander V. Zhdanov,Rafael D.L. Gaspar,Dmitri B. Papkovsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4150180
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Using several types of Pt-porphyrin based oxygen sensing materials and conditions, we evaluated comparatively four different detection platforms that perform phosphorescence lifetime (PLT) measurements in the microsecond time domain. The time-resolved fluorescence reader Victor 2, which utilises Rapid Lifetime Determination method and Xe-flash lamp excitation, produced stable but inaccurate readings at PLT values <15 µs, affected by the flash-lamp afterglow and sensor heterogeneity in oxygenated conditions. The luminescence spectrometer Cary Eclipse, which utilises multi-point phosphorescence decay method, was able to partly correct these interfering factors and produce more accurate PLT values from mono- and bi-exponential fits, however short PLT values were still affected by Xe-flash lamp afterglow. The wide-field Tpx3Cam cam-era-based macroscope and the confocal laser-scanning FLIM/PLIM microscope, which use short-pulse excitation (ns LED or ps diode laser pulses, respectively) and TCSPC method, revealed the presence of short-lived components (1.5 – 6.0 µs) in sample decays, which have to be considered in PLT calculations. The imaging platforms produced more accurate and in-formative PLT data, but they operate with large volumes of raw and processed data. Overall, for each PLT platform a number of potential sources of error and measurement artefacts have been revealed, which can be minimised by careful optimisation of settings and validation with alternative platforms and sensor materials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?