Meta-Analysis of Brief Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Duration after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Chayakrit Krittanawong,Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk,Ameesh Isath,Zhen Wang,Srihari S. Naidu,Roxana Mehran,Yochai Birnbaum,Glenn N. Levine,Hani Jneid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.03.045
2022-01-01
Abstract:Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) represents the cornerstone of therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal duration of DAPT remains controversial as extended duration reduces ischemic events but at the cost of increased bleeding. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether 1 month of DAPT followed by antiplatelet monotherapy is noninferior to prolonged DAPT. 1 Hong SJ Kim JS Hong SJ Lim DS Lee SY Yun KH Park JK Kang WC Kim YH Yoon HJ Won H Nam CM Ahn CM Kim BK Ko YG Choi D Jang Y Hong MK One-Month DAPT Investigators1-month dual-antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy after polymer-free drug-coated stent implantation: one-month DAPT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14: 1801-1811 Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar ,2 Giacoppo D Matsuda Y Fovino LN D'Amico G Gargiulo G Byrne RA Capodanno D Valgimigli M Mehran R Tarantini G Short dual antiplatelet therapy followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 308-319 PubMed Google Scholar
What problem does this paper attempt to address?