One- versus three-month dual antiplatelet therapy in high bleeding risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Davide Cao,Pascal Vranckx,Marco Valgimigli,Samantha Sartori,Dominick J Angiolillo,Sripal Bangalore,Deepak L Bhatt,Yihan Feng,Junbo Ge,James Hermiller,Raj R Makkar,Franz-Josef Neumann,Shigeru Saito,Hector Picon,Ralph Toelg,Aziz Maksoud,Bassem M Chehab,James W Choi,Gianluca Campo,José M De la Torre Hernandez,Mitchell W Krucoff,Vijay Kunadian,Gennaro Sardella,Alessandro Spirito,Holger Thiele,Olivier Varenne,Birgit Vogel,Yujie Zhou,Stephan Windecker,Roxana Mehran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00658
2024-05-20
EuroIntervention
Abstract:Background: A short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration has been proposed for patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing drug-eluting coronary stent (DES) implantation. Whether this strategy is safe and effective after a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) remains uncertain. Aims: We aimed to compare the impact of 1-month versus 3-month DAPT on clinical outcomes after DES implantation among HBR patients with or without NSTE-ACS. Methods: This is a prespecified analysis from the XIENCE Short DAPT programme involving three prospective, international, single-arm studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of 1-month (XIENCE 28 USA and Global) or 3-month (XIENCE 90) DAPT among HBR patients after implantation of a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. Ischaemic and bleeding outcomes associated with 1- versus 3-month DAPT were assessed according to clinical presentation using propensity score stratification. Results: Of 3,364 HBR patients (1,392 on 1-month DAPT and 1,972 on 3-month DAPT), 1,164 (34.6%) underwent DES implantation for NSTE-ACS. At 12 months, the risk of the primary endpoint of death or myocardial infarction was similar between 1- and 3-month DAPT in patients with (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.65) and without NSTE-ACS (HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.63-1.23; p-interaction=0.34). The key secondary endpoint of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 2-5 bleeding was consistently reduced in both NSTE-ACS (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37-0.88) and stable patients (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.15; p-interaction=0.15) with 1-month DAPT. Conclusions: Among HBR patients undergoing implantation of an everolimus-eluting stent, 1-month, compared to 3-month DAPT, was associated with similar ischaemic risk and reduced bleeding at 1 year, irrespective of clinical presentation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?