Abstract:Perineal lacerations could lead to substantial morbidities for women. A reliable prediction model for perineal lacerations has the potential to guide the prevention. Although several prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of perineal lacerations, especially third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations, the evidence about the model quality and clinical applicability is scarce. To systematically review and critically appraise the existing prediction models for perineal lacerations. Seven databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data) were systematically searched from inception to July 2022. Studies that developed prediction models for perineal lacerations or performed external validation of existing models were considered eligible to include in the systematic review. Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction according to the Checklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies. The risk of bias and the applicability of the included models were assessed with the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the characteristics, risk of bias, and performance of existing models. Of 4345 retrieved studies, 14 studies with 22 prediction models for perineal lacerations were included. The included models mainly aimed to estimate the risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. The top five predictors used were operative vaginal birth (72.7 %), parity/previous vaginal birth (63.6 %), race/ethnicity (59.1 %), maternal age (50.0 %), and episiotomy (40.1 %). Internal and external validation was performed in 12 (54.5 %) and seven (31.8 %) models, respectively. 13 studies (92.9 %) assessed model discrimination, with the c-index ranging from 0.636 to 0.830. Seven studies (50.0 %) evaluated the model calibration using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, Brier score, or calibration curve. The results indicated that most of the models had fairly good calibration. All the included models were at higher risk of bias mainly due to unclear or inappropriate methods for handling missing data and continuous predictors, external validation, and model performance evaluation. Six models (27.3 %) showed low concerns about applicability. The existing models for perineal lacerations were poorly validated and evaluated, among which only two have the potential for clinical use: one for women undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and the other one for all women undergoing vaginal birth. Future studies should focus on robust external validation of existing models and the development of novel models for second-degree perineal laceration. CRD42022349786. The existing models for perineal lacerations during childbirth need external validation and updating. Tools are needed for second-degree perineal laceration.

Risk Factors for Severe Perineal Lacerations During Childbirth: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Cohort Studies

The Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Pregnant Women with Placenta Previa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prediction Models for Perineal Lacerations During Childbirth: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Risk Factors for Birth Canal Lacerations in Primiparous Women.

Effects of Perineal Warm Compresses during the Second Stage of Labor on Reducing Perineal Trauma and Relieving Postpartum Perineal Pain in Primiparous Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Lubricant for reducing perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effectiveness of small-angle episiotomy on incisional laceration rate, suturing time, and incisional bleeding in primigravida: A meta-analysis

The Effectiveness of Perineal Warm Compresses During the Second Stage of Labor on Reducing Perineal Trauma and Relieving Postpartum Perineal Pain in Primiparous Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

The Risk Factors of Postpartum Urinary Retention for Women by Vaginal Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Incidence and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

PFMT Relevant Strategies to Prevent Perineal Trauma: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

First and Second Stage Risk Factors Associated with Perineal Lacerations

Lubricant for Reducing Perineal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Evaluation of perineal wound healing and pain outcomes after low‐angle mediolateral episiotomy in women undergoing vaginal childbirth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Effects of Perineal Massage During Childbirth on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Primiparous Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A nationwide cross-sectional survey of episiotomy practice in China

Meta-analysis of risk factors for maternal postpartum hemorrhage

Effects of perineal massage at different stages on perineal and postpartum pelvic floor function in primiparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Effect of “hands On” Techniques on Obstetric Perineal Laceration: A Structured Review of the Literature

Risk factors for postpartum urinary retention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Risk factors related to surgical wound infection after caesarean section: A systematic review and meta‐analysis