Abstract:Introduction:Renal stones are a common pathology in daily practice with a continuously increasing incidence. Using flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), urologists can treat difficult renal stones through the natural orifice and maintain a satisfactory stone-free rate. Even though advancing technologies offer the opportunity for minimally invasive surgery, the surgeon is still exposed to a considerable amount of ionizing radiation during several procedures. In this study, the aim is to determine the efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy without fluoroscopy in terms of stone-free rates and complications. Materials and methods:In the Urology Department of Saint John Clinical Emergency Hospital in Bucharest, Romania, a retrospective study was conducted on 98 patients diagnosed with renal calculi between September 2020 and December 2021. Using two different groups, the demographic characteristics of patients, characteristics of stones (size, number, location), the use of fluoroscopy, the operative time (in minutes) and postoperative complications, and the stone-free rate were compared. In one of the groups, fluoroscopy was used during fURS (Group I), while in the second group (Group II), no ionizing radiation was used during fURS. Results:Twenty-four males and 23 females were enrolled in Group I, whereas 31 males and 20 females were enrolled in Group II. The mean age of subjects was 63.2 years old in the fluoroscopy group and 61.6 years old in the group without fluoroscopy. While the stone characteristics revealed some variations in stone location between the compared groups, there were no statistical differences in mean stone diameter (1.489 mm - Group I vs. 1.588 mm - Group II). Stone-free rates and complications classified using Clavien-Dindo modified system for urological surgeries were used to analyze the main results. Group II had a slightly higher stone-free rate, but statistical studies found no significant differences; therefore, both methods are deemed equal in this field. Identified complications were classified as Clavien I and II and were successfully treated for both groups. Conclusion:This study reveals that by adhering to additional intraoperative measurements for guiding the access sheath, fURS without fluoroscopy can be performed safely and with a high success rate.

Fluoroless Versus Conventional Ureteroscopy for Urinary Stones: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Comparative Study to Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Residual Calculi after Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Renal Stones: is Fluoroscopy-Free Technique Achievable?

A Novel Ureterorenoscope for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Stones: Initial Experience from a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety

Single-Use Versus Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes for the Treatment of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Flexible Ureteroscopy Without Radiation Exposure

Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones

Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Efficacy and Safety of Radiation-Free Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter-Based, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with or without ureteral access sheath: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The association between novel negative pressure ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with flexible ureteroscopy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy on stone-free rates: implications for clinical practice and policy

Comparison of stone-free rate between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery

Ureteroscopy and lasertripsy for lower pole stones <2 cm, in situ vs displacement? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The Efficacy of Ureteroscopy Without Fluoroscopy for Ureteral and Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients

Ureteroscopy in proximal ureteral stones after shock wave lithotripsy failure: Is it safe and efficient or dangerous?

Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes As a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for ≤ 2 cm renal stones

A Prospective Comparative Study Between Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine Position and Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Management of Single Large Stone in the Proximal Ureter.