Abstract:Background: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the main treatments for upper urinary tract stones. The Ureteral Access Sheath (UAS) serves as a supplementary tool, facilitating direct kidney access during RIRS. High quality of evidence comparing tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath (S-UAS) with traditional UAS in RIRS for the treatment of renal and ureteral stones is lacking. The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of S-UAS with traditional UAS in RIRS for the treatment of renal or ureteral stones ≤30 mm. Methods: An international, multicenter, and superiority randomized controlled trial included 320 intention-to-treat patients across 8 medical centers in China, the Philippines, Malaysia and Turkey from August 2023 to February 2024. The inclusion criteria were patients ≥18 years old with renal or ureteral stones ≤30 mm. RIRS was performed using either S-UAS or traditional UAS. The primary outcome was the immediately stone-free rate (SFR). Secondary outcomes included SFR 3 months after operation, operating time, hospital stay, auxiliary procedures, complications (using the Clavien-Dindo grading system), and improvement in the Quality of Life (QoL) score. Differences between proportions [risk difference (RD)]/means [mean difference (MD)] and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05952635. Findings: The S-UAS group demonstrated a significantly higher immediately SFR (81.3% versus 49.4%; RD 31.9%; 95% CI 22.5%-41.7%; p = 0.004) compared to the traditional UAS group, as determined by the one-side superiority test. Additionally, the S-UAS group exhibited a higher SFR at 3 months post-operation (87.5% versus 70.0%; RD 17.5%; 95% CI 8.7%-26.3%; p < 0.001), lower postoperative fever rate (RD -11.9%; 95% CI -18.7% to -4.9%; p < 0.001), reduced use of stone baskets (RD -70.6%; 95% CI -77.8% to -63.5%; p < 0.001), and better QoL improvement (MD 7.25; 95% CI 2.21-12.29; p = 0.005). No statistically significant differences were observed in operation time, hospital stay, or the need for second-stage RIRS. Interpretation: In RIRS for upper urinary tract stones ≤30 mm, S-UAS exhibited superior performance compared to traditional UAS, demonstrating higher SFR, reduced postoperative fever rate, and improved QoL outcomes. S-UAS emerges as a prudent and advantageous alternative to traditional UAS for RIRS. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China and Guangdong Province, and Zhejiang Medicine and Health Program.

A Novel Ureterorenoscope for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Stones: Initial Experience from a Prospective Multicenter Study.

A Novel Semirigid Ureterorenoscope with Vacuum Suctioning System for Management of Single Proximal Ureteral and Renal Pelvic Stones: An Initial Experience

Single-Use Versus Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes for the Treatment of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

A Novel Flexible Ureteroscopy with Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure: an Initial Experience of 93 Cases

Flexible Ureteroscopy with Novel Flexible Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3 Cm Renal Stones

Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi

Application of 11/13Fr suctioning ureteral access sheath and 8.55Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope in one-stage flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: an initial experience of 900 cases

Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes As a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes As A Potential Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Multicenter Case-Control Study

Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study

The Safety and Efficacy of Sotn Ureteroscopy for Renal and Upper Ureteral Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Could Use of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Be a Potential Game-changer in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Outcomes at 30 Days from a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, Real-world Study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section

7.5F Mini Flexible Ureteroscope in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Initial Results from a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trail

Comparative Analysis of Sun's Ureteroscope and Flexible Ureteroscope in Management of Renal Calculus (≤2 Cm)

Efficacy and Safety of NTrap® Stone Entrapment and Extraction Device for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy

Recent advances in the treatment of renal stones using flexible ureteroscopys

A retrospective comparison of Sun's tip-flexible semirigid ureterorenoscopy, super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy applied to treat upper urinary tract calculi

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using holmium laser for 187 patients with proximal ureteral stones.

Endoscopic Ureteral Dilation Balloon Catheter for a Difficult Ureter: A New Novel Approach

Comparison of the Efficacy of ShuoTong Ureteroscopy and Simple Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Calculi

Omnidirectional (Flexible) Ureteral Access Sheath: Safety, Efficacy, and Initial Experience Report