Response To: Loutradis Et Al. Longer Dialysis Sessions Improve Cardiac Systolic Function by Reducing Myocardial Stunning

Brendan Smyth,Christopher T. Chan,Stuart M. Grieve,Rajesh Puranik,Li Zuo,Daqing Hong,Nicholas Gray,Janak R. de Zoysa,Anish Scaria,Martin Gallagher,Vlado Perkovic,Meg Jardine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.09.001
IF: 6.592
2020-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:We are grateful for the chance to correspond with Loutradis et al, who reasonably suggest that a decreased volume overload may drive improvement in end-diastolic volume. In response to this idea, we have conducted a further analysis of the ACTIVE Dialysis trial participants to determine if a change in body weight was associated with change in end-diastolic volume, or modified the relationship between this parameter and allocation to extended hours dialysis. As described in detail elsewhere, 1 Smyth B Chan CT Grieve SM Puranik R Zuo L Hong D et al. Predictors of change in left-ventricular structure and function in a trial of extended hours hemodialysis. J Card Fail. 2020; 26: 482-491 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar 2 Jardine MJ Zuo L Gray NA de Zoysa JR Chan CT Gallagher MP et al. A trial of extending hemodialysis hours and quality of life. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28: 1898-1911 Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar 95 members of a larger cohort of hemodialysis recipients randomized to extended (≥24 hours per week) or standard (12–18 hours per week) hemodialysis for 12 months had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed at baseline and study end. Assuming that changes in weight owing to changes in volume overload would manifest early and persist, we defined change in weight as the difference between baseline weight and the mean of weights at each of the follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. In the 95 participants, the median change in weight was +0.75 kg (interquartile range –1.25 to 3.25) and the mean change in end-diastolic volume was –4.3 mL (95% confidence interval –11.8 to 3.1). Using generalized linear regression, we found no relationship between change in weight and change in end-diastolic volume, nor did change in weight modify the relationship between extended hours dialysis and change in end-diastolic volume. These findings did not change after adjustment for those parameters associated with change in end-diastolic volume in univariable analysis, 1 Smyth B Chan CT Grieve SM Puranik R Zuo L Hong D et al. Predictors of change in left-ventricular structure and function in a trial of extended hours hemodialysis. J Card Fail. 2020; 26: 482-491 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar or with adjustment for baseline weight (Table 1). The results were similar if change in weight at 3 months was used instead of the average of all follow-up visits (data not shown). Table 1Regression Models of Change in End-Diastolic Volume and Change in Body Weight in the ACTIVE Dialysis Study Change in End-Diastolic Volume (95% Confidence Interval) (mL) P Value Model 1 Change in weight (kg) –0.25 (–2.1 to 1.6) .80 Model 2 Change in weight (kg) –5.60 (–20.76 to 9.55) .47 Allocation to extended hours dialysis 0.98 (–1.80 to 3.76) .49 Allocation to extended hours dialysis × change in weight (kg) –2.02 (–5.84 to 1.79) .30 Model 3 Change in weight (kg) –0.42 (–2.07 to 1.22) .61 Baseline end-diastolic volume (mL) –0.40 (–0.55 to –0.24) <.001 Diabetes –11.09 (–25.14 to 2.95) .12 Use of inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system Baseline use 2.49 (–14.53 to 19.50) .78 Use during follow-up –7.05 (–28.19 to 14.08) .51 Open table in a new tab
What problem does this paper attempt to address?