Do Institutional Investors Collude with Listed Companies: Analysis Based on Non-voluntary Management Turnover and Selection of Succession
Pan Yue,Dai Yiyi,Wei Shiqi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.02.009
2011-01-01
Abstract:The growing up of global institutional investors is an important trend in the financial field in the past thirty years. According to the statistical data until 2009, institutional investors have accounted for half of the circulated market equity in the capital market, and up to sixty percent of the listed companies have institutional investors as their first ten greatest shareholders. Do institutional investors possess ability of corporate governance in our country? It is a new topic which needs urgent research in the corporate governance field. Which role do institutional investors play in corporate governance, "effective monitor", "onlooker", or "colluder"? From the existed academic results, we can see that scholars have tried to explore the role institutional investors play in corporate governance from all points and directions. However, the conclusions are different. Therefore, it is necessary to choose a new research point in order to enrich academic achievements about institutional investors’ role in corporate governance. By using Ashare listed companies in the period of the year 2004 and 2008 as research sample, this article empirically tests the impact of institutional investors on the decision of non-voluntary management turnover and succession, to confirm the role of institutional investors in corporate governance. The results show that, the more institution investors hold shares; the sensitivity of management turnover to accounting performance is lower. Furthermore, even after management turnover, inside succession is more likely for firms with more institutional investors share-holding. We document performance improvements subsequent to non voluntary turnover and outside succession, while changes in earnings performance are not significant for inside succession. All these results show that institutional investors play the role of management’s "colluder" in non-voluntary turnover and succession. Grouping sample results show that institutional investors have only impact on CEO turnover and succession, not on the chairman of the board. Moreover, the higher the firm’s ownership concentration is, the influence of institutional investors is more insignificant. From the above conclusion, we can suggest that regulators should set up correlative system to regulate the behavior of institutional investors, strengthen the penalty, increase costs and risks of collusion, and put an end to the possibility of collusion between institutional investors and executives of listed companies as far as possible.