Abstract:High-quality environmental information disclosure is not only an effective way for the firm to fulfill its environmental responsibility and promote green development, but also an important governance mechanism to reduce the degree of information asymmetry between the firm's management and shareholders and alleviate the agency conflict. As an important shareholder of a firm, there are two different hypotheses about the influence of institutional investors on firm decision-making and behavior: monitor and collusion. Institutional investors are not homogeneous, and there are significant differences in the impact of different types of institutional investors on firm decision-making and behavior. We divide institutional investors into the stable institutional investors and the unstable institutional investors, using the data of listed firms in China's A-share heavy pollution industry between 2008 and 2020, and this study explores the effect of institutional investors' heterogeneity on environmental information disclosure behavior from the perspective of environmental information disclosure quality. Empirical evidence shows that institutional investors as a whole have a positively significant impact on environmental information disclosure quality. Further analysis shows that the stable institutional investors have positive impact on environmental information disclosure quality compared with the unstable institutional investors. After a series of robustness tests, the conclusion is still valid. The results of this paper show that institutional investors, especially the stable institutional investors, can effectively reduce the degree of information asymmetry, alleviate the agency conflict of the firm, play an active role in corporate governance, strengthen the main responsibility of firm ecological environment protection, and promote the green development of firm. The conclusion of this paper has important reference significance for the regulators to formulate policies to improve environmental information disclosure quality and promote green development according to the heterogeneity of institutional investors.

The Relationship Between Heterogeneous Institutional Investors' Shareholdings and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence From China

Institutional ownership heterogeneity and ESG performance: Evidence from China

Investor–Firm Interactions and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Which institutional investors can improve the level of corporate ESG information disclosure?

Corporate ESG Performance and Shareholding Preference of Institutional Investors

Research on the Influence Mechanism of ESG Performance on Institutional Investors' Shareholding: Empirical evidence from China

Institutional Investor Networks and ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate ESG Performance in China

Do institutional investors’ holdings affect corporate environmental information disclosure? Evidence from China

Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance, Financing Constraints, and Corporate Investment Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China

Do institutional investors' corporate site visits improve ESG performance? Evidence from China

The Influence of ESG on Firm Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China

The Impact of Institutional Investors on Firm Performance: Evidence from China

Institutional Investors Heterogeneity and Firm Performance:Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Domestic vs. Foreign Institutional Investors: Who Improves ESG and Value of Chinese Companies?

Corporate culture and ESG performance: Empirical evidence from China

Monitoring or Colluding? Institutional Investors' Heterogeneity and Environmental Information Disclosure Behavior

Influence of ESG Performance on Fund's Propensity to Hold Shares -Empirical Evidence from China's A-share Listed Enterprises

An Empirical Study on the Performance of Heterogeneous Institutional Investors and A-share Enterprises

ESG Performance, Institutional Investors and Corporate Risk-taking: Empirical Evidence from China

Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Corporate Sustainable Development in China