Abstract:Previous studies have shown that people would like to sacrifice benefits to themselves in order to avoid inequitable outcomes, not only when they receive less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion) but also when they receive more (advantageous inequity aversion). This feature is captured by the theory of inequity aversion. The present study was inspired by what appears to be asymmetry in the research paradigm toward advantageous inequity aversion. Specifically, studies that supported the existence of advantageous inequity aversion always relied on the paradigm in which participants can determine allocations. Thus, it is interesting to know what would occur if participants could not determine allocations or simply passed judgment on predetermined allocations. To address this, a behavioral experiment (N = 118) and a skin conductance response (SCR) experiment (N = 29) were adopted to compare participants' preferences for advantageous inequity directly when allocations were determined and when allocations were predetermined in an allocating task. In the determined condition, participants could divide by themselves a sum of money between themselves and a matched person, whereas in the predetermined condition, they could simply indicate their satisfaction with an equivalent program-generated allocation. It was found that, compared with those in the determined condition, participants in the predetermined condition behaved as if they liked the advantageous inequity and equity to the same degree (Experiment One) and that the SCRs elicited by advantageous inequity had no differences from those elicited by equity, suggesting that participants did not feel negatively toward advantageous inequity in this situation (Experiment Two). The present study provided mutual corroboration (behavioral and electrophysiological data) to document that advantageous inequity aversion may differ as a function of the individual's role in determining allocations, and it would disappear if individual cannot determine allocations.

An experimental test of the solemn oath in eliciting sincere preferences

Consumers’ Cognitive Bias and Willingness to Pay for Chilled Pork: Evidence from Science Experiments and Auctions in China

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

Testing the effectiveness of lottery incentives in online experiments

Selling Creates A Loss While Buying Generates A Gain: Capturing the Implicit Irrational Bias by the Iat Method

A Comparison of the Reliability of the Take-It-Or-Leave-It and the Bidding Game Approaches to Estimating Willingness-To-Pay in A Rural Population in West Africa

Rational Anchoring in Economic Valuations

Differences between odd number and even number response formats: Evidence from mainland Chinese respondents

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

Experimental evidence on the effect of incentives and domain in risk aversion and discounting tasks

The effect of incentives on intertemporal choice: Choice, confidence, and eye movements

Auctioneer Behavior When Bidders Face Ambiguity : An Experimental Study ∗

Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity

Choosing The Best Incentives for Belief Elicitation with an Application to Political Protests

A De-biased Direct Question Approach to Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay

Auction methods of valuation and the endowment effect

Impact of Ex‐Ante Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Methods on Attribute Non‐Attendance in Choice Experiments

Eliciting willingness-to-pay to decompose beliefs and preferences that determine selection into competition in lab experiments

Why High Incentives Cause Repugnance: A Framed Field Experiment

Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate?

On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methods