Auctioneer Behavior When Bidders Face Ambiguity : An Experimental Study ∗

Yan Chen
2006-01-01
Abstract:This study examines the reaction of bidders and auctioneers to bidder ambiguity about other bidders’ distribution of valuations in a laboratory experiment of first-price (FPA) and secondprice (SPA) auctions with sealed bids and independent private values. In particular, we study an environment where the distribution of bidder valuations is known to the auctioneer but may or may not be known to the bidders. We formulate theoretical hypotheses using the α−MEU framework. We find that, in FPA, auctioneers set lower reserve prices in the presence of ambiguity, and that, in both FPA and SPA, bidders bid less. Further results show that, in case of FPA, this difference is accounted for by different reserve prices. We do find, however, that in FPA bidders are ambiguity loving, and that there is a weak evidence for the reserve price serving as a signal about the true distribution of bidder valuations. Aggregate results suggest that, in FPA, ambiguity may increase bidder earnings and overall auction efficiency at no expense to auctioneers by encouraging the latter to set lower reserve prices. On the other hand, as suggested by theory, ambiguity has little impact in SPA. If one is asking the question of which auction format to use in the presence of ambiguity, FPA loses its revenue edge from the no ambiguity case, but this is compensated for by a higher efficiency of this format. Therefore the answer to the question of which format to use rests on whether the designer wishes to maximize auctioneer revenue or social efficiency of the mechanism.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?