Comparative Ecomorphology of Ornithopod and Ruminant Snouts – a Geometric Morphometric Approach

Jonathan Tennant,Norman MacLeod
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1094592.1
2013-01-01
F1000Research
Abstract:The data set used to construct the ornithopod snout was from second-hand pro le outlines It was also taxonomically constrained, the ontogenetic stage of specimens was unknown, and also included some duplicate taxa with high variability We want to create a new data set using rst hand specimens, and what is available in the literature, to broadly sample all ornithopod taxa possible, and use this ruminant morphospace to infer their ecologies. The same applies to other megaherbivore groups (e.g., extinct ruminants, sauropods) BODY MASS Body mass data is freely available from the PanTHERIA database Relationship between body mass and snout centroid size shows that browsers may be more ecologically disparate in terms of feeding strategy AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 1. To identify a morphospace that describes the geometry of ruminant snouts (ventral aspect of premaxilla) using principal components analysis 2. To see if snout shape can be used to delimit discrete functional groups (browsers and grazers) using a canonical variates analysis 3. To identify that major modes of shape variation that describe the di erent functional groups 4. To see where ruminants of ‘unknown’ ecology plot in this functional morphospace 5. To test how ornithopod dinosaurs project into the morphospace, and whether we can infer their ecologies based on this BACKGROUND AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. Snout shape is a de ning ‘trait’ of di erent ecological groups in extant and extinct ruminant species 2. Previous assessment of snout shape lacked rigour, or created gaps between groups based on limited sampling A. To what extent can these functional groups of browsers and grazers be delimited within a statistically-robust and geometry-based framework? B. Can ornithopod dinosaurs, extinct analogies of ruminants, be classed in a similar manner using the ruminant morphospace as a classi cation basis?
What problem does this paper attempt to address?