Abstract:The basic concepts, notions and methods of geometric morphometrics (GM) are considered. This approach implies multivariate analysis of landmark coordinates located following certain rules on the surface of a morphological object. The aim of GM is to reveal differences between morphological objects by their shapes as such, the "size factor" being excluded. The GM is based on the concept of Kendall's space (KS) defined as a hypersphere with points distributed on its surface. These points are the shapes defined as aligned landmark configurations. KS is a non-Euclidian space, its metrics called Procrustes is defined by landmark configuration of a reference shape relative to which other shapes are aligned and compared. The differences among shapes are measured as Procrustes distances between respective points. For the linear methods of multivariate statistics to be applied to comparison of shapes, the respective points are projected onto the tangent plane (tangent space), the tangent point being defined by the reference. There are two principal methods of shape comparisons in GM: the Procrustes superimposition (a version of the least squares analysis) and thin-plate spline analysis. In the first case, Procrustes residuals are the outcome shape variables which remain after isometric alignment of the shapes being compared. Their summation over all landmarks yields Procrustes distances among these shapes. The Procrustes distances can be used in multivariate analyses just as the Euclidian distances. In the second case, the shapes are fitted to the references by stretching/compressing and shearing until complete identity of their landmark configurations. Eigenvectors of resulting bending energy matrix are defined as new shape variables, principal warps which yield another shape space with the origin defined by the reference. Projections of the shapes being compared onto principal warps yield partial warps, and their covariance matrix decomposition into eigenvectors yields relative warps which are similar to principal components (in particular, they are mutually orthogonal). Both partial and relative warps can be used in many multivariate statistic analyses as quantitative shape variables. Results of thin-plate spline analysis can be represented graphically by transformation grid which displays type, amount and localization of the shape differences. Basis rules of sample composition and landmark positioning to be used in GM are considered. At present, rigid (with minimal degrees of freedom) 2D morphological objects are most suitable for GM applications. It is important to recognize three type of real landmarks, and additionally semi-landmarks and "virtual" landmarks. Some procedures of thin-plate spline analysis are considered exemplified by some study cases, as well as applications of some standard multivariate methods to GM results. They make it possible to evaluate correlation between different shapes, as well as between a shape and some non-shape variables (linear measurements etc); to evaluate the differences among organisms by shape of a morphological structure; to identify landmarks which most accounted for both correlation and differences between the shapes. An annotated list of most popular softwares for GM is provided.

A practical, step-by-step, guide to taxonomic comparisons using Procrustes geometric morphometrics and user-friendly software (part A): introduction and preliminary analyses

The relative performance of geometric morphometrics and linear‐based methods in the taxonomic resolution of a mammalian species complex

Geometric morphometrics of microscopic animals as exemplified by model nematodes

Reworking Geometric Morphometrics into a Methodology of Transformation Grids

On the Misidentification of Species: Sampling Error in Primates and Other Mammals Using Geometric Morphometrics in More Than 4000 Individuals

Distances and Algorithms to Compare Sets of Shapes for Automated Biological Morphometrics

Reliable Phylogenetic Regressions for Multivariate Comparative Data: Illustration with the MANOVA and Application to the Effect of Diet on Mandible Morphology in Phyllostomid Bats

Do morphometric data improve phylogenetic reconstruction? A systematic review and assessment

Can morphotaxa be assessed with photographs? Estimating the accuracy of two‐dimensional cranial geometric morphometrics for the study of threatened populations of African monkeys

Sample Size and Geometric Morphometrics Methodology Impact the Evaluation of Morphological Variation

Novel Bayesian Procrustes Variance-based Inferences in Geometric Morphometrics & Novel R package: BPviGM1

Assessing the application of landmark-free morphometrics to macroevolutionary analyses

A Graph-Based Mathematical Model for More Efficient Dimensionality Reduction of Landmark Data in Geometric Morphometrics

[Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics]

Geometric morphometrics of silky pocket mice ( Perognathus : Perognathinae: Rodentia) crania reveals new insights into their variation, evolution, and taxonomy

Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness

A guide to plant morphometrics using Gaussian Mixture Models

Studying Morphological Variation: Exploring the Shape Space in Evolutionary Anthropology

Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches

MusMorph, a database of standardized mouse morphology data for morphometric meta-analyses

Bolstering geometric morphometrics sample sizes with damaged and pathologic specimens: Is near enough good enough?