Literature,in Front of Law——An Explanation of Derrida's View on Literature and Law

Xiaoming Chen
2006-01-01
Abstract:In the traditional literary theory or legal theory, literature is totally unrelated to law.But Derrida,with his unique(perspective,) made them closely related.He put literature in front of law,which at least involves two aspects.One is about the rules of literature.How rules are defined? What rules can define literature? How works can be called literature? Derrida even asked if literature as a genre really exists.What texts can be seen as literature in comparison with philosophy,ethics and history? Furthermore,is there a classification of different genres such as novel,prose or other literary forms? If yes,what rules are(followed?) The second is about the relation between literature and law,which is more important.The modern law guarantees the independent existence of literary works,protecting their signature right,copyright and unique legality.On the other hand,literature also constructs law.In interpreting Kafka's In Front Of Law,Derrida tried to deconstruct how literary narrative was constructed.Literature is in front of law,but also exists somewhere else.It can not be protected by law all the time.In a moment of surpassing law,literature can have an orientation of transcending itself.Derrida used law to deconstruct literature and used literature to deconstruct law.His ideas can motivate us to think more about the nature of literature.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?