Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of Simultaneous Kissing Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations

Feng Xu

2010-01-01

Abstract:Obejective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of simultaneous kissing sirolimus-eluting(SKS) stent technique versus provisional side-branch stenting(PSS) in true coronary bifurcations.Methods One hundred patients with a coronary bifurcation lesion were randomized selected to be treated with simultaneous kissing stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents(SES) in both branches and 100 patients to be treated with provisional side-branch stenting with SES in the main branch followed by provisional SES placement in the side branch only for inadequate results.The patients were followed up for one year for monitoring in-segment restenosis rate,the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events(death,myocardial infarction,target-lesion revascularization) and stent thrombosis.Results There were no significant differences in clinical features including in-segment restenosis,death,myocardial infarction,target-lesion revascularization,stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events between PSS group and SKS group during the 12 months follow-up period(P0.05).In the patients with dissection formation during predilation of side-branches,there were no differences on death,myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis between treatment with PSS and with SKS(P0.05),However,the occurrences of in-segment restenosis,target-lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiac events in these patients with dissection formation were higher if treated with PSS(P0.05).Conclusion In large coronary bifurcations,SKS and PSS had similar in-hospital and long-term efficacy.If there were dissection formation in the side-branches after pre-dilation,the SKS technique should be selected.Otherwise,the PSS technique should be considered.