Contrasting Accessory Mineral Assemblages in the Taohuadao Peralkaline and Putuoshan Aluminous A-type Granites, Zhejiang Province

XlE Lei,Rucheng Wang,Wang Dezi,Jianxian Qiu
2005-01-01
Abstract:Two typical East China′s coastal perakaline and aluminous A-type granites are developed in Taohuadao and Putuoshan of Zhejiang Province, respectively. Their geochemistry and main rock-forming minerals show a clear distinction. Detailed electron-microprobe analyses reveal that accessory minerals from these two granite subgroups are different. The Taohuadao′s contains abundant zircons, allanite, chevkinite and Fe-Ti minerals (titanomagnetite,ilmenite and pyrophanite). By contrast, in the Putuoshan’s, the accessory-mineral assemblage is Th-poor zoned zircon, Ce-monazite and Fe-Ti oxide minerals dominated by magnetite, rutile and pyrophanite. Besides, these two granites could also be defined by internal structure and chemical composition of accessory minerals, especially zircon. Based on the above-mentioned features of accessory minerals, differences in origins, crystallization environments and physicochemical properties between these two granites could thus be inferred. Firstly, Th-rich zircon indicates a relatively high-temperature, Th-rich and deep-sourced magma for the peralkaline granites. Secondly, the presence of magnetite and rutile suggests the high fo_2 during the crystallization of aluminous A-type granite. Thirdly, the occurrence of allanite or Ce-monazite shows the differences of the alkaline index and P_2O_5 activity between the peralkaline and aluminous A-type magmas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?