Post-Orogenic Alkaline Granites from China and Comparisons with Anorogenic Alkaline Granites Elsewhere

DW Hong,SG Wang,BF Han,MY Jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-9547(96)00002-5
1996-01-01
Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences
Abstract:Alkaline granites can be broadly divided into anorogenic (AA-type) and post-orogenic (PA-type). The former heralds the beginning of rifting and the latter is an indicator of the end of orogeny. Although it is difficult to distinguish anorogenic and post-orogenic alkaline granites, they can be identified on the basis of differences in geology, petrology and geochemistry: (1) PA-type granites are formed shortly after plate subduction and plate collision; AA-type granites are independent of subduction and collision. (2) AA-type granitic magmatism is of long time duration; PA-type granitic magmatism is generally short-lived. (3) AA-type granites tend to be associated with lithospheric rifting; PA-type granites are commonly associated with ophiolitic plate suture zones. (4) AA-type granites are often closely associated with mafic rocks and silica-undersaturated syenites; PA-type granites are the final products of a long tectonic magmatic cycle dominated by a normal calc-alkaline series. (5) AA-type granites have an extended range in R1 (500–3000; the range for PA-type granites is very narrow RC 2300–2600). The GaAl ratio of the former is generally 4–9, while that of the latter is 2–4. The former is more enriched in Zr, Nb, Ce and Y and has smaller YNb and CeNb ratios than the latter.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?