Abstract:Background and objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications after laparoscopic anus-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, which significantly prolongs the patient's hospital stay, leads to dysfunction, and even increases the patient's perioperative morbidity and mortality, and little is known about the effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures to prevent AL. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement sutures as a means to prevent AL during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic search was performed in the literature database by combining subject and free terms up to 10 October 2023. The overall literature included was integrated and analyzed using Stata 12.0 software and Review Manager version 5.4 software to assess the effect of anastomotic reinforcement sutures on the incidence of AL. Results: A total of 2,452 patients from 14 studies were included, and an integrated analysis showed that the use of anastomotic reinforcement sutures significantly reduced the incidence of AL [odds ratio (OR) = 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.37; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%]. However, the findings confirmed whether or not the anastomosis reinforced with sutures did not affect the incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.37–1.32; P = 0.27; I 2 = 0%). We performed subgroup analyses of the results of the study, the randomized controlled studies (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15–0.65; P < 0.001) as well as retrospective studies (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19–0.41; P < 0.001), 3–0 sutures (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17–0.45; P < 0.001) versus 4–0 sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13–0.53; P < 0.001), barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.48; P < 0.001) versus non-barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001), interrupted (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001) versus continuous sutures (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) to the anastomosis, full-thickness suture (OR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) versus sutured with the seromuscular layer (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001), anastomotic sutured in one (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001) versus non-one circle (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.44; P < 0.001), and reinforcing sutures to the dog-ear area (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.50; P < 0.001) versus the non–dog-ear area (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.45; P < 0.001), which have suggested that there is no significant difference between each other and that all of them reduce the incidence of AL. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that performing reinforcement suturing of the anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery significantly lowers the incidence of postoperative AL but has no significant effect on anastomotic stenosis. It is important to note that further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm this conclusion. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022368631.

The Application of Cecostomy by Appendiceal Stump Intubation for Prevention of the Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery

Clinical Analysis of 9 Cases of a Novel Stent Assisted Intestinal Bypass for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

A Stent-Based Diverting Technique after Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Our Preliminary Experience.

The Efficacy of Intraoperative ICG Fluorescence Angiography on Anastomotic Leak after Resection for Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

A case of pelvic huge solitary fibrous tumor with rectum and retroperitoneum invasion

Suspension and Suturing Technique Can Reduce the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Excision: a Single, Prospective, Cohort Study

Effect of Reinforcement Suture of Anastomotic Stoma During Radical Resection of Esophageal Carcinoma in Prevention of Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage

Influence of Different Treatment Methods of Left Colic Artery on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

Application of Spontaneously Closing Cannula Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer

Effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a pooled and integration analysis

[Meta-Analysis for High-Risk Factor of Anastomotic Leakage after Anal-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer].

Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Comparison of specimen extraction site and another site for protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective comparative study

Association between intraoperative application of microfibrillar collagen hemostat and anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study

Reflection on the Present Study of Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery

Clinical application of a novel stent-assisted in situ intestinal bypass in preventing postoperative anastomotic leakage for low-mid rectal cancer: A retrospective study

Preoperative Nutritional Therapy Reduces the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage in Patients with Crohn's Disease Requiring Resections

Successful treatment of anastomotic leakage with an intestinal obstruction catheter and stent by colonoscopy: a case report and brief literature review

Oversewing the Esophageal Stump-A Way to Decrease the Occurrence of Anastomotic Leak

Transcecum catheterization ileostomy is safe and effective to prevent anastomotic leakage in post-laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study

Modifications in Retrosternal Reconstruction after Oesophagogastrectomy May Reduce the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage