Abstract:Background and objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications after laparoscopic anus-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, which significantly prolongs the patient's hospital stay, leads to dysfunction, and even increases the patient's perioperative morbidity and mortality, and little is known about the effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures to prevent AL. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement sutures as a means to prevent AL during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic search was performed in the literature database by combining subject and free terms up to 10 October 2023. The overall literature included was integrated and analyzed using Stata 12.0 software and Review Manager version 5.4 software to assess the effect of anastomotic reinforcement sutures on the incidence of AL. Results: A total of 2,452 patients from 14 studies were included, and an integrated analysis showed that the use of anastomotic reinforcement sutures significantly reduced the incidence of AL [odds ratio (OR) = 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.37; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%]. However, the findings confirmed whether or not the anastomosis reinforced with sutures did not affect the incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.37–1.32; P = 0.27; I 2 = 0%). We performed subgroup analyses of the results of the study, the randomized controlled studies (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15–0.65; P < 0.001) as well as retrospective studies (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19–0.41; P < 0.001), 3–0 sutures (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17–0.45; P < 0.001) versus 4–0 sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13–0.53; P < 0.001), barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.48; P < 0.001) versus non-barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001), interrupted (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001) versus continuous sutures (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) to the anastomosis, full-thickness suture (OR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) versus sutured with the seromuscular layer (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001), anastomotic sutured in one (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001) versus non-one circle (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.44; P < 0.001), and reinforcing sutures to the dog-ear area (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.50; P < 0.001) versus the non–dog-ear area (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.45; P < 0.001), which have suggested that there is no significant difference between each other and that all of them reduce the incidence of AL. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that performing reinforcement suturing of the anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery significantly lowers the incidence of postoperative AL but has no significant effect on anastomotic stenosis. It is important to note that further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm this conclusion. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022368631.

Effect of Reinforcement Suture of Anastomotic Stoma During Radical Resection of Esophageal Carcinoma in Prevention of Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage

Clinical Analysis of 9 Cases of a Novel Stent Assisted Intestinal Bypass for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

Effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a pooled and integration analysis

Effect of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement suture on the prevention of anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture with a Purse-String Suture Technique on the Gastric Side During Esophageal Carcinoma Operations: Retrospective Study of 463 Consecutive Cases.

Suspension and Suturing Technique Can Reduce the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Excision: a Single, Prospective, Cohort Study

The effect of reinforcing sutures and trans-anal drainage tube on the outcome of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: propensity score‑matched analysis

Anastomotic leakage and postoperative mortality in patients after esophageal cancer resection

Early postoperative endoscopy for predicting anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A large-volume retrospective study

Risk Factors of Benign Stricture of Anastomotic Stoma after Esophagectomy and Therapeutic Effect of Stent Implantation

The Application of Cecostomy by Appendiceal Stump Intubation for Prevention of the Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery

Oversewing the Esophageal Stump-A Way to Decrease the Occurrence of Anastomotic Leak

Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

[Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer].

A case of pelvic huge solitary fibrous tumor with rectum and retroperitoneum invasion

[Meta-Analysis for High-Risk Factor of Anastomotic Leakage after Anal-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer].

Modifications in Retrosternal Reconstruction after Oesophagogastrectomy May Reduce the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage

A new technology for reducing anastomotic fistula in the neck after esophageal cancer surgery

Endoscope-assisted Mediastinal Drainage Therapy for Anastomosis Leakage after Esophagectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Effect of Intra- and Out-Anorectal Drainage in the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Low Anterior Resection