Influence of Distinct Testing Methods on the Mode-I Fracture Toughness of Longmaxi Shale

Kun Zheng,Yu Zhao,Chaolin Wang,Jing Bi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.104213
IF: 4.374
2024-01-01
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
Abstract:Abundant shale gas in shale reservoirs can be successfully extracted by the fracking technique. The formation of hydraulic fractures is related to the mode-I fracture toughness that represents the resistance to cracking propagation. Two typical Longmaxi shale samples with horizontal and vertical bedding planes are selected in this work. To adequately measure the mode-I fracture resistance of shale, this research adopts four mode-I test specimens with different geometries (cuboid, cylinder, disk, and semi-disk). The experimental results demonstrate that there is an acceptable linear correlation between mode-I fracture resistance and critical T-stress. Further, the discrepancies in mode-I fracture resistance are due to distinct T-stresses that exist in the mode-I test specimens. Consequently, the mode-I fracture toughness KIc for the shale with horizontal bedding is 1.57 MPa & sdot;m0.5, while that for the shale with vertical bedding is 1.36 MPa & sdot;m0.5. Considering the influences of singular and non-singular stress terms, the GMTSN (generalized maximum tangential strain) and GMTSEDF (generalized maximum tangential strain energy density factor) fracture criteria can provide theoretical explanations for the variation of mode-I fracture resistance measurements. Based on the AE (acoustic emission) technique, the classical RA -AF method can identify the fracture mechanisms of distinct mode-I test specimens. However, the differences in the high-density zones of the RA -AF distribution are conspicuous for distinct mode-I testing methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?