CTNI-44. A PHASE 0 ‘TRIGGER’ TRIAL OF PAMIPARIB IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED AND RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS

Nader Sanai,Yu‐Wei Chang,Jun Jiang,Jennifer K. Molloy,Chelsea Montgomery,Jocelyn Harmon,Amy Hong,John E. Wanebo,William Kennedy,Michael Garcia,Igor J. Barani,Wonsuk Yoo,Artak Tovmasyan,An‐Chi Tien,Jing Li,Shwetal Mehta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac209.309
2022-01-01
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:This study evaluates glioblastoma (GBM) pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of pamiparib, a PARP1/2-selective inhibitor, graduating patients to a therapeutic expansion phase of drug plus radiotherapy. Newly-diagnosed (Arm A) and recurrent GBM (Arm B) patients received 4 days of pamiparib (60 mg BID) prior to planned resection at 2-4 or 8-12 hours following the final dose. Arm C included recurrent GBM patients who received 4 days of olaparib (200 mg BID). Tumor tissue cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. A PK ‘trigger’, defined as unbound drug > 5-fold biochemical IC50 in nonenhancing tumor determined eligibility for the therapeutic expansion phase. PARP inhibition was assessed via ex vivo radiation and quantification of PAR levels compared to non-radiated control. All patients exceeding the PK threshold were eligible for an expansion phase of study drug plus radiotherapy followed by maintenance regimen. In Arms A (n = 20) and B (n = 15), the mean unbound concentrations of pamiparib in Gd-nonenhancing tumor region were 171.5 nM and 102.9 nM, respectively and in Arm C (n = 4) the mean unbound concentration of olaparib was 11.0 nM. All patients in Arms A and B, but only one in Arm C, exceeded the PK threshold to qualify for the expansion phase of the study. 12/20 (60%), 7/14 (50%), and 1/4 (25%) patients in Arms A, B, and C, respectively progressed to expansion phase. Radiation-induced PAR expression was 2.44 fold in untreated control vs 1.16 in Arm A, 0.82 in Arm B and 1.11 in Arm C patients, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.4 (Arm A) (n = 7), 5.0 months (Arm B) (n = 6), and 2.7 months (Arm C) (n = 1), respectively. Pamiparib was generally well-tolerated, achieved pharmacologically-relevant concentrations in nonenhancing GBM tissue and suppressed induction of PAR levels ex vivo post-radiation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?