Efficacy and Safety of Niraparib as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC After First-Line Chemotherapy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study
Xinghao Ai,Yueyin Pan,Jianhua Shi,Nong Yang,Chunling Liu,Jianying Zhou,Xiaodong Zhang,Xiaorong Dong,Jianxing He,Xiaoling Li,Gongyan Chen,Xingya Li,Helong Zhang,Wangjun Liao,Yiping Zhang,Zhiyong Ma,Liyan Jiang,Jiuwei Cui,Chunhong Hu,Wei Wang,Cheng Huang,Jun Zhao,Cuimin Ding,Xiaohua Hu,Kai Wang,Beili Gao,Yong Song,Xiaoqing Liu,Jianping Xiong,Anwen Liu,Junling Li,Zhe Liu,Yinyin Li,Mengzhao Wang,Biao Zhang,Dan Zhang,Shun Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.04.001
IF: 20.121
2021-08-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Introduction</h3><p>ZL-2306-005 is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib, a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, as first-line maintenance therapy in Chinese patients with platinum-responsive, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to standardized, platinum-based first-line chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or placebo (300 mg [baseline body weight ≥ 77 kg, platelet count ≥ 150,000/μL] or 200 mg) once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) (blinded independent central review) and overall survival (sample size planned: 591 patients). Secondary end points included investigator-evaluated PFS and safety.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>ZL-2306-005 was terminated early owing to ES-SCLC treatment landscape changes (data cutoff: March 20, 2020). During July 2018–February 2020, a total of 185 of 272 patients screened were randomized (niraparib: n = 125 [CR = 1, PR = 124]; placebo: n = 60 [CR = 1, PR = 59]). Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS (blinded independent central review) was 1.54 months (1.41–2.69, niraparib) and 1.36 months (1.31–1.48, placebo); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46–0.95, <em>p</em> = 0.0242). Median overall survival was 9.92 months (9.33–13.54, niraparib) and 11.43 months (9.53–not estimable, placebo); HR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.62–1.73, <em>p</em> = 0.9052). Median investigator-evaluated PFS was 1.48 months (1.41–2.56, niraparib) and 1.41 months (1.31–2.00, placebo); HR = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.61–1.26; <em>p</em> = 0.4653). Grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events occurred in 34.4% (niraparib) and 25.0% (placebo) of patients.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>ZL-2306-005 did not reach primary end points. Nevertheless, niraparib as maintenance therapy modestly improved PFS in patients with platinum-responsive ES-SCLC, with acceptable tolerability profile and no new safety signal.</p>
oncology,respiratory system