P721: PREDICTIVE SCORING SYSTEMS FOR MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN PERSONS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA RECEIVING INITIAL IMATINIB THERAPY

X. Zhang,Zhijun Li,M. Zhang,P. G. Robert,Xiao‐Jun Huang,Qian Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hs9.0000845768.41886.03
2022-01-01
HemaSphere
Abstract:Background: Nowadays more patients have benefited from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy to achieve a stable major molecular response (MMR) and even deep molecular responses (DMR, at least MR4), which prevented disease progression and allows for pursuing treatment-free remission (TFR). However, there were still lacking of robust prediction models for molecular responses including MMR or DMR to TKI-therapy. Aims: Develop and validate predictive scoring systems for MMR and MR4 in persons with newly-diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving imatinib. Methods: Data from 1364 consecutive subjects were randomly-assigned 2:1 to training (n=909) and validation (n=455) datasets. Co-variates significantly associated with MMR and MR4 in multi-variable analyses in the training dataset were used to develop a predictive scoring system based on standardized regression coefficients (beta [β]) and the model tested in the validation dataset. Time-dependent area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUROC), calibration plots and decision curve analyses (DCAs) were used to evaluate predictive accuracy. Results: In the training dataset, male sex (β=-0.350, HR=0.7 [95%CI: 0.6, 0.8]), WBC ≥ 130 ×10E+9/L (β=-0.538, HR=0.6 [0.5, 0.7]), hemoglobin < 110 g/L (β=-0.490, HR=0.6 [0.5, 0.8]) and EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) risk score (intermediate-risk: β=-0.464, HR=0.6 [0.5, 0.8]; high-risk: β=-0.743, HR =0.5 [0.3, 0.7]) were significantly-associated with lower cumulative incidence of MMR. Each co-variate was assigned 1 point in the predictive scoring system for MMR except WBC ≥ 130 ×10E+9/L and ELTS high-risk assigned 2 points. Using the predictive scoring system, subjects were classified into (1) low- (score=0-1; n=429, 47%), (2) intermediate- (score=2-4; n=340, 38%); and (3) high- (score=5-6; n=140, 15%) risk subgroups. 5-year cumulative incidences of MMR were 86% (84, 89%), 61% (55, 65%) and 34% (27, 43%) (p for trend <0.001; Figure A). Comparable 5-year cumulative incidences in validation dataset were 86% (82, 90%), 69% (64, 74%) and 31% (22, 40%) (p for trend<0.001; Figure B). AUROC values were 0.77 and 0.74 in the training and validation datasets. Similar analyses for MR4 in training dataset identified male sex (β=-0.282, HR=0.8 [0.6, 0.9]), WBC ≥ 120 ×10E+9/L (β=-0.747, HR=0.5 [0.4, 0.6]), hemoglobin<110 g/L (β=-0.496, HR=0.6 [0.5, 0.8]) and ELTS risk score (intermediate-risk: β=-0.509, HR=0.6 [0.4, 0.8]; high-risk: β=-1.212, HR=0.3 [0.1, 0.6]) were significantly-associated with lower cumulative incidence of MR4. Male sex was assigned 1 point; ELTS intermediate-risk and hemoglobin < 110 g/L, 2 points; WBC ≥ 120 ×10E+9/L, 3 points; and ELTS high-risk, 4 points in the predictive scoring system for MR4. Subjects in the training dataset were classified into (1) low- (score=0-2; n=416, 46%), (2) intermediate- (score=3-7; n=348, 38%); and (3) high- (score=8-10; n=145, 16%) risk cohorts. 5-year cumulative incidences of MR4 were 71% (70, 73%), 35% (31, 39%) and 16% (10, 22%) (p for trend<0.001, Figure C). Similar 5-year cumulative incidences in validation dataset were 66% (61, 71%), 45% (38, 52%) and 21% (12, 30%) (p for trend<0.001, Figure D). AUROC values were 0.76 and 0.72. Calibration plots and DCAs showed good performance for predicting MMR and MR4. Image:Summary/Conclusion: We developed the predictive scoring systems for MMR and MR4 in persons with chronic phase CML receiving imatinib. These data may help physicians make an appropriate therapy decision.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?