Combination of Socio-Demographic and Clinical Co-Variates for Predicting Treatment Responses and Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Chronic Phase

X S Zhang,Y Z Qin,Y,H X Shi,X J Huang,Q Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2022.01.011
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the impacts of socio-demographic and clinical co-variates on treatment responses and outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and identified the predictive models for them.Methods:Data of newly diagnosed adult patients with CML-CP receiving first-line TKI and having complete socio-demographic data and clinical information were reviewed. Cox model was used to identify the independent variables associated with complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) , major molecular response (MMR) , molecular response 4 (MR 4) and molecular response 4.5 (MR 4.5) , as well as failure-free survival (FFS) , progression-free survival (PFS) , overall survival (OS) and CML-related OS. Results:A total of 1414 CML-CP patients treated with first-line imatinib ( n=1176) , nilotinib ( n=170) or dasatinib ( n=68) were reviewed. Median age was 40 (18-83) years and 873 patients (61.7% ) were males. Result of the multivariate analysis showed that lower educational level ( P<0.001-0.070) and EUTOS long-term survival intermediate or high-risk ( P<0.001-0.009) were significantly associated with lower cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR 4 and MR 4.5, as well as the inferior FFS, PFS, OS and CML-related OS. In addition, those who were males, from rural households, had white blood cells (WBC) ≥120×10 9/L, hemoglobin (HGB) <115 g/L and treated with first-line imatinib had significantly lower cumulative incidences of cytogenetic and/or molecular responses. Being single, divorced or widowed, having, rural household registration, WBC≥120×10 9/L, HGB<15 g/L, and comorbidity (ies) was significantly associated with inferior FFS, PFS, OS, and/or CML-related OS. Thereafter, the patients were classified into several subgroups using the socio-demographic characteristics and clinical variables by cytogenetic and molecular responses, treatment failure and disease progression, as well as overall survival and CML-related OS, respectively. There were significant differences in treatment responses and outcomes among the subgroups ( P<0.001) . Conclusion:Except for clinical co-variates, socio-demographic co-variates significantly correlated with TKI treatment responses and outcomes in CML-CP patients. Models established by the combination of independent socio-demographic and clinical co-variates could effectively predict the responses and outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?