Clinical Implication of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Burden in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: from the GUIDE-IT.

Bin Dong,Chen,Yuanqi Zheng,Yugang Dong,Chen Liu,Ruicong Xue,Cong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.10.050
2024-01-01
Abstract:This study aimed to explore the prognostic implication of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) burden on heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We performed a post hoc analysis of the GUIDing Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure (GUIDE-IT) trial. NT-proBNP burden was defined as the proportion of days with increased NT-proBNP (>= 1,800 pg/ml) to the whole observation time. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the association with NT-proBNP burden and prognosis. A total of 815 patients with HFrEF were analyzed in our study. Patients were categorized into 4 groups accord -ing to the degree of NT-proBNP burden. In the multivariate Cox analysis, NT-proBNP burden was significantly associated with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalization. Compared with patients without NT-proBNP burden, the risk for the composite outcome increased by 210% (hazard ratio [HR] 3.10, 95% confidence inter -val [CI] 1.72 to 5.58, p <0.001) in NT-proBNP burden 1 (mild) group, 432% (HR 5.32, 95% CI 2.93 to 9.67, p <0.001) in NT-proBNP burden 2 (moderate) group, and over 12 times (HR 13.15, 95% CI 7.42 to 23.33, p <0.001) in NT-proBNP burden 3 (severe) group. The sensitivity analyses stratified by age and renal function yielded similar results. A higher NT-proBNP burden was associated with a significant increase in risks of all -cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalization, and composite outcome. The results suggested that NT-proBNP burden could be an important predictor of the prognosis of patients with HFrEF. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Car-
What problem does this paper attempt to address?