Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Resisting Membership Inference Attacks by Dynamically Adjusting Loss Targets.

EI-MTD: Moving Target Defense for Edge Intelligence Against Adversarial Attacks

Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks: RM Learning is All You Need

MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace Training

Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Classification Models

Overconfidence is a Dangerous Thing: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Enforcing Less Confident Prediction

Defenses to Membership Inference Attacks: A Survey

How to Combine Membership-Inference Attacks on Multiple Updated Machine Learning Models

Mitigating Privacy Risk in Membership Inference by Convex-Concave Loss

How to Combine Membership-Inference Attacks on Multiple Updated Models

On the Discredibility of Membership Inference Attacks

Order of Magnitude Speedups for LLM Membership Inference

A Method to Facilitate Membership Inference Attacks in Deep Learning Models

Is Difficulty Calibration All We Need? Towards More Practical Membership Inference Attacks

Membership reconstruction attack in deep neural networks

Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparison

When Fairness Meets Privacy: Exploring Privacy Threats in Fair Binary Classifiers via Membership Inference Attacks

Fundamental Limits of Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Models

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Defending Privacy Against More Knowledgeable Membership Inference Attackers

Confidence Is All You Need for MI Attacks