Abstract:Abstract The Covid-19 pandemic led to threatening shortages in healthcare of medical products such as face masks. Due to this major impact on our healthcare society an initiative was conducted between March and July 2020 for reprocessing of face masks from 19 different hospitals. This exceptional opportunity was used to study the costs impact and the carbon footprint of reprocessed face masks relative to new disposable face masks. The aim of this study is to conduct a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess and compare the climate change impact of disposed versus reprocessed face masks. In total 18.166 high quality medical FFP2 face masks were reprocessed through steam sterilization between March and July 2020. Greenhouse gas emissions during production, transport, sterilization and end-of-life processes were assessed. The background life cycle inventory data were retrieved from the ecoinvent database. The life cycle impact assessment method ReCiPe was used to translate emissions into climate change impact. The cost analysis is based on actual sterilization as well as associated costs compared to the prices of new disposable face masks. A Monte Carlo sampling was used to propagate the uncertainty of different inputs to the LCA results. The carbon footprint appears to be 58% lower for face masks which were reused for five times compared to new face masks which were used for one time only. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the loading capacity of the autoclave and rejection rate of face masks has a large influence on the carbon footprint. The estimated cost price of a reprocessed mask was €1.40 against €1.55. The Life Cycle Assessment demonstrates that reprocessed FFP2 face masks from a circular economy perspective have a lower climate change impact on the carbon footprint than new face masks. For policymakers it is important to realize that the carbon footprint of medical products such as face masks may be reduced by means of circular economy strategies. This study demonstrated a lower climate change impact and lower costs when reprocessing and reusing disposable face masks for five times. Therefore, this study may serve as an inspiration for investigating reprocessing of other medical products that may become scarce. Finally, this study advocates that circular design engineering principles should be taken into account when designing medical devices. This will lead to more sustainable products that have a lower carbon footprint and may be manufactured at lower costs.

Life-cycle Assessment Reveals Disposable Surgical Masks in 2020–2022 Led to More Than 18 Million Tons of Carbon Emissions

Environmental Effects of the Disposable Surgical Masks for Preventing COVID-19

Carbon footprint assessment of face masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Based on different protective performance and applicable scenarios

Exergy intensity and environmental consequences of the medical face masks curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic: Malign bodyguard?

Life cycle assessment of single-use surgical and embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask

Environmental Risks of Disposable Face Masks During the Pandemic of COVID-19: Challenges and Management.

Comparative Environmental Impact Evaluation of Disposable Surgical and Reusable Cloth Face Masks

Global face mask pollution: Threats to the environment and wildlife, and potential solutions

Understanding the environmental impacts of facemasks: a review on the facemask industry and existing life cycle assessment studies

A Pandemic-Induced Environmental Dilemma of Disposable Masks: Solutions from the Perspective of the Life Cycle

A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic

Global daily mask use estimation in the pandemic and its post environmental health risks: Analysis based on a validated dynamic mathematical model

Mask Crisis During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Adverse environmental effects of disposable face masks due to the excess usage

Neglected Microplastics Pollution in Global COVID-19: Disposable Surgical Masks

Thermochemical treatment of daily COVID-19 single-use facemask waste: Power generation potential and environmental impact analysis

Environmental implication of personal protection equipment in the pandemic era: LCA comparison of face masks typologies

Feasibility of biodegradable material polylactic acid as a substitute for polypropylene for disposable medical masks production verified by life cycle assessment

Generation of environmental persistent free radicals (EPFRs) enhances ecotoxicological effects of the disposable face mask waste with the COVID-19 pandemic

Advances and perspectives on the life-cycle impact assessment of personal protective equipment in the post-COVID-19 pandemic

Life cycle assessment of Tehran's COVID-19 facemasks and prediction of environmental impacts using machine learning