Abstract:Widespread concerns have been raised about the huge environmental burden caused by massive consumption of face masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, most of the existing studies only focus on the environmental impact associated with the product itself regardless of the actual usage scenarios and protective performance of products, resulting in unrealistic conclusions and poor applicability. In this context, this study integrated the product performance into the existing carbon footprint assessment methodology, with focus on the current global concerns regarding climate change. Computational case studies were conducted for different mask products applicable to the scenarios of low-, medium- and high-risk levels. The results showed that reusable cotton masks and disposable medical masks suitable for low-risk settings have a total carbon footprint of 285.484 kgCO 2 -eq/FU and 128.926 kgCO 2 -eq/FU respectively, with a break-even point of environmental performance between them of 16.886, which implies that cotton masks will reverse the trend and become more environmentally friendly after 17 washes, emphasizing the importance of improving the washability of cotton masks. Additionally, the total carbon footprints of disposable surgical masks and KN95 respirators were 154.328 kg CO 2 -eq/FU and 641.249 kg CO 2 -eq/FU respectively, while disposable medical masks and disposable surgical masks were identified as alternatives with better environmental performance in terms of medium- and high-risk environments respectively. The whole-life-cycle oriented carbon footprint evaluation further indicated that the four masks have greater potential for carbon emission reduction in the raw material processing and production processes. The results obtained in this study can provide scientific guidance for manufacturers and consumers on the production and use of protective masks. Moreover, the proposed model can be applied to other personal protective equipment with similar properties, such as protective clothing, in the future.

Environmental Effects of the Disposable Surgical Masks for Preventing COVID-19

Life-cycle Assessment Reveals Disposable Surgical Masks in 2020–2022 Led to More Than 18 Million Tons of Carbon Emissions

Carbon footprint assessment of face masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Based on different protective performance and applicable scenarios

Exergy intensity and environmental consequences of the medical face masks curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic: Malign bodyguard?

Environmental Risks of Disposable Face Masks During the Pandemic of COVID-19: Challenges and Management.

Life cycle assessment of single-use surgical and embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask

A Pandemic-Induced Environmental Dilemma of Disposable Masks: Solutions from the Perspective of the Life Cycle

Comparative Environmental Impact Evaluation of Disposable Surgical and Reusable Cloth Face Masks

Adverse environmental effects of disposable face masks due to the excess usage

Neglected Microplastics Pollution in Global COVID-19: Disposable Surgical Masks

Global face mask pollution: Threats to the environment and wildlife, and potential solutions

Generation of environmental persistent free radicals (EPFRs) enhances ecotoxicological effects of the disposable face mask waste with the COVID-19 pandemic

Global daily mask use estimation in the pandemic and its post environmental health risks: Analysis based on a validated dynamic mathematical model

Environmental impact of personal protective equipment distributed for use by health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic

Environmental risks of polymer materials from disposable face masks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic

Understanding the environmental impacts of facemasks: a review on the facemask industry and existing life cycle assessment studies

Feasibility of biodegradable material polylactic acid as a substitute for polypropylene for disposable medical masks production verified by life cycle assessment

Advances and perspectives on the life-cycle impact assessment of personal protective equipment in the post-COVID-19 pandemic

Public face masks wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis is needed for potential implications

Used disposable face masks are significant sources of microplastics to environment

Mask Crisis During the COVID-19 Outbreak