Abstract:Being persistent, toxic, and bio-accumulative, Mercury (Hg) seriously affects the environment and human health. Due to Hg's attribute of long-range environmental transport across national borders, especially through atmospheric transport, no country can fully protect its environment and human health with its own efforts, without global cooperation. The Minamata Convention on Mercury, which was formally adopted and opened for signature in October 2013, is the only global environmental regime on the control of Hg pollution. Its main substantive control measures are source-specific: its phasing-out, phasing-down, and other main substantive requirements all direct to specific categories of pollution sources through the regulation of specific sectors of the economy and social life. This Convention does not take a national quota approach to quantify the Parties' nationwide total allowable consumption or discharge of Hg or Hg compounds, nor does it quantify their nationwide total reduction requirements. This paper attempts to find the underlying reasons for this source-specific approach and offers two interpretations. One possible interpretation is that Hg might be a non-threshold pollutant, i.e., a pollutant without a risk-free value of concentration. The existence of a reference dose (RfD), reference concentration (RfC), provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), minimal risk level (MRL) or other similar reference values of Hg does not necessarily mean that Hg cannot be regarded as non-threshold because such reference values have scientific uncertainties and may also involve policy considerations. Another interpretation is that Hg lacks a feasibly determinable total allowable quantity. There is evidence that negotiators might have treated Hg as non-threshold, or at least accepted that Hg lacks a feasibly determinable total allowable quantity: (1) The negotiators were informed about the serious situations of the current emissions, releases, and legacy deposition; (2) the UNEP Secretariat took the position that Hg is non-threshold and should be eliminated to the maximum; (3) European countries, the USA and other western countries were in a better position to regard Hg as non-threshold and push forward a global reduction of Hg emissions and releases to the minimum; (4) the negotiators took the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) as a model; and (5) a fairly large number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) were organized under umbrella NGO networks such as the Zero Mercury Working Group (ZMWG) and the International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) and made a significant contribution to the negotiation process. The interpretations for the Minamata Convention might similarly be used to interpret the source-specific approach of the Stockholm Convention on POPs and the national quota approach of global environmental regimes on stratospheric ozone and climate mitigation. These two interpretations focus on the features of the pollutants and for this reason may be useful for future negotiators of other international environmental treaties to select appropriate models. They also suggest that the source-specific approach may be adopted in the future for pollutants with similar features of being possibly non-threshold and without a feasibly determinable total allowable quantity.

Gaseous Mercury Limit Values: Definitions, Derivation, and the Issues Related to Their Application

Bioaccumulation of Mercury along Continuous Fauna Trophic Levels in the Yellow River Estuary and Adjacent Sea Indicated by Nitrogen Stable Isotopes

Mercury Speciation, Transformation, and Transportation in Soils, Atmospheric Flux, and Implications for Risk Management: A Critical Review

Levels and Sources of Atmospheric Particle-Bound Mercury in Atmospheric Particulate Matter (PM10) at Several Sites of an Atlantic Coastal European Region

Fast and Accurate Speciation of Mercury in Milk and Honey Food Products by HPLC-ICP-MS

Hazardous properties and toxicological update of mercury: From fish food to human health safety perspective

Mercury in Groundwater – Source, Transport and Remediation

Mercury in the natural environment: Biogeochemical cycles and associated health risks

The Silver Linings of Mercury: Reconsideration of Its Impacts on Living Organisms from a Multi-Timescale Perspective.

Mercury in Oil and Natural Gas and Its Critical Assessment

A Review with a Discussion on Public Health

Assessment of mercury bioavailability in garden soils around a former nonferrous metal mining area using DGT, accumulation in vegetables, and implications for health risk

Mercury abatement in the environment: Insights from industrial emissions and fates in the environment

Atmospheric gaseous mercury and associated health risk assessment in the economic capital of India

Transfer of mercury through soil-plant-atmosphere-human continuum and influence factors

Gaseous Elemental Mercury Exchange Fluxes over Air-Soil Interfaces in the Degraded Grasslands of Northeastern China

Strategies for mercury speciation with single and multi-element approaches by HPLC-ICP-MS

Mercury air, urine monitoring and health effects on occupationally exposed dental healthcare workers in Delhi, India

Interpretation of the source-specific substantive control measures of the Minamata Convention on Mercury

Mercury in natural gas streams: A review of materials and processes for abatement and remediation

Unexpected anthropogenic emission decreases explain recent atmospheric mercury concentration declines