Abstract:Background: The proliferation of misinformation on social media is a significant concern due to its frequent occurrence and subsequent adverse social consequences. Effective interventions for and corrections of misinformation have become a focal point of scholarly inquiry. However, exploration of the underlying causes that affect the public acceptance of misinformation correction is still important and not yet sufficient. Objective: This study aims to identify the critical attributions that influence public acceptance of misinformation correction by using attribution analysis of aspects of public sentiment, as well as investigate the differences and similarities in public sentiment attributions in different types of misinformation correction. Methods: A theoretical framework was developed for analysis based on attribution theory, and public sentiment attributions were divided into 6 aspects and 11 dimensions. The correction posts for the 31 screened misinformation events comprised 33,422 Weibo posts, and the corresponding Weibo comments amounted to 370,218. A pretraining model was used to assess public acceptance of misinformation correction from these comments, and the aspect-based sentiment analysis method was used to identify the attributions of public sentiment response. Ultimately, this study revealed the causality between public sentiment attributions and public acceptance of misinformation correction through logistic regression analysis. Results: The findings were as follows: First, public sentiments attributed to external attribution had a greater impact on public acceptance than those attributed to internal attribution. The public associated different aspects with correction depending on the type of misinformation. The accuracy of the correction and the entity responsible for carrying it out had a significant impact on public acceptance of misinformation correction. Second, negative sentiments toward the media significantly increased, and public trust in the media significantly decreased. The collapse of media credibility had a detrimental effect on the actual effectiveness of misinformation correction. Third, there was a significant difference in public attitudes toward the official government and local governments. Public negative sentiments toward local governments were more pronounced. Conclusions: Our findings imply that public acceptance of misinformation correction requires flexible communication tailored to public sentiment attribution. The media need to rebuild their image and regain public trust. Moreover, the government plays a central role in public acceptance of misinformation correction. Some local governments need to repair trust with the public. Overall, this study offered insights into practical experience and a theoretical foundation for controlling various types of misinformation based on attribution analysis of public sentiment.

Combating Health Misinformation on Social Media Through Fact-Checking: the Effect of Threat Appraisal, Coping Appraisal, and Empathy

What motivates people to counter misinformation on social media? Unpacking the roles of perceived consequences, third-person perception and social media use

The Roles of Worry, Social Media Information Overload, and Social Media Fatigue in Hindering Health Fact-Checking

Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention

Fact-Checking of Health Information: The Effect of Media Literacy, Metacognition and Health Information Exposure

Community Fact-Checks Trigger Moral Outrage in Replies to Misleading Posts on Social Media

Hope over fear: The interplay between threat information and hope appeal corrections in debunking early COVID-19 misinformation

Combating Health Misinformation in Social Media: Characterization, Detection, Intervention, and Open Issues

Checking the Fact-Checkers: the Role of Source Type, Perceived Credibility, and Individual Differences in Fact-Checking Effectiveness

Effects of Time Pressure, Reward, and Information Involvement on User Management of Fake News on a Social Media Platform

Investigation of Public Acceptance of Misinformation Correction in Social Media Based on Sentiment Attributions: Infodemiology Study Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

Exploring the impact of automated correction of misinformation in social media

Gaming with health misinformation: a social capital-based study of corrective information sharing factors in social media

Nudging Away Health Misinformation on Social Media: The Roles of Social Influences and Power Distance.

How People Process Different Types of Health Misinformation: Roles of Content Falsity and Evidence Type

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention

Let's fight the infodemic: the third-person effect process of misinformation during public health emergencies

Misinformation as a harm: structured approaches for fact-checking prioritization

Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Induces Renal Heme Oxygenase-1 via NF-E2-Related Factor 2 in Rats and Mice

Finding Strategies Against Misinformation in Social Media: A Qualitative Study

Explaining Health Misinformation Belief through News, Social, and Alternative Health Media Use: The Moderating Roles of Need for Cognition and Faith in Intuition