Epcoritamab + R2 Regimen and Responses in High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma, Regardless of POD24 Status.

Reid Merryman,David Belada,Anna Sureda,Sirpa Leppa,Joost S. P. Vermaat,Harald Holte,Martin Hutchings,Pieternella Lugtenburg,Sven de Vos,Pau Abrisqueta,Marcel Nijland,Jacob Haaber Christensen,Bjorn E. Wahlin,Kim M. Linton,Liwei Wang,Aqeel Abbas,Ali Rana,Syed Quadri,Lorenzo Falchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.7506
IF: 45.3
2023-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:7506 Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a heterogeneous disease. Early progression after initial treatment (tx) with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), POD24, occurs in around 20% of patients (pts) and strongly predicts poor outcomes. There is no standard tx approach for high-risk, relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL (high-risk subgroups in Table). Novel options are needed to improve efficacy in pts with high unmet need. Epcoritamab, a subcutaneous (SC) T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody, demonstrated impressive single-agent antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in R/R FL (Hutchings et al, Lancet 2021) and shows promise combined with standards of care. Here we present pooled analyses from cohorts 2a and 2b of the ongoing phase 1/2 EPCORE NHL-2 trial (NCT04663347) of epcoritamab with rituximab + lenalidomide (R 2 ). Methods: Pts with R/R CD20 + FL received epcoritamab SC + R 2 for 12 cycles (Cs; 28 d each). Epcoritamab was dosed QW in C1–3, Q2W in C4–9, and Q4W in C≥10 (2a) or QW in C1–2 and Q4W in C≥3 (2b) for ≤2 y. Results: As of Oct 31, 2022, 109 R/R FL pts had received epcoritamab 48 mg + R 2 in 2a and 2b. Median age was 65 y, 56% of pts had FLIPI 3–5, 61% had stage IV disease, and 59% had only 1 prior tx. Most had received alkylating agents (92%) or anthracyclines (62%); 2 had prior CAR T. At a median follow-up of 8.8 mo (range, 1.2–18.5), 82% were still on tx. The most common tx-emergent AEs were: CRS and neutropenia, 48% each; injection-site reactions, 38%; and fatigue, 33%. CRS events were mostly low grade (G; 46% G1–2, 2% G3) and mostly occurred following the first full dose on C1D15; all resolved and none led to discontinuation. ICANS occurred in 2 pts (G1, G2) and resolved. In 101 efficacy-evaluable pts, overall response rate (ORR) was 97%, with complete metabolic response (CMR) in 86%. Notably, pts achieved higher ORR/CMR rates with epcoritamab + R 2 vs their immediate prior tx line (ORR, 97% vs 85%; CMR, 86% vs 60%). Estimated 6-mo progression-free survival was 93%. In second-line (2L) pts with POD24, ORR/CMR rates were 95%/90% (additional high-risk subgroup data in Table). Additional data with longer follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: Epcoritamab + R 2 showed potent antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in a large R/R FL population. Encouraging responses were seen in pts with high-risk disease, suggesting epcoritamab SC may abrogate negative effects of high-risk features. A separate POD24 cohort is planned, and epcoritamab + R 2 is being studied in the phase 3 EPCORE FL-1 trial (NCT05409066). Clinical trial information: NCT04663347 . [Table: see text]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?