Abstract:Background: There are few treatment options for relapsed/refractory (r/r) T cell lymphoma (TCL). We previously reported the safety and efficacy of a single center, single arm, trial of the check-point inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab in combination with the Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) romidepsin in r/r TCL pts who progressed after at least one prior systemic regimen (NCT03278782). The rationale for combining CPI with HDACi was that TCLs often carry multiple gene mutations in epigenetic modifier genes TET2, IDH2, DNMT3A and TCR related genes CD38, RHOA, and FYN that may impair immunogenicity and promote immune escape. Herein, we report the updated results of the Phase II study along with the correlative PDL1 evaluation. METHODS: In this phase I/II trial, safety was evaluated in the lead-in phase I study using a dose de-escalation strategy, with Pembrolizumab at 200 mg on day 1 and Romidepsin 14 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, the eventual phase II study dosage. Adverse events were monitored and graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 guidelines. Primary objectives were to determine safety, tolerability, and overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included complete remission rate (CRR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DOR). Outcome assessment were performed utilizing Lugano Revised Response Criteria and correlated with PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry and exploratory analysis for cell of origin. RESULTS: 20 pts were evaluable for the primary endpoint (Table 1); the median age was 67 and a male predominance. The phase I component included 6 pts, with cohort expansion secondary to one DLT of hypotension and renal insufficiency. Prior therapies included induction chemotherapy with CHOP or CHOP like in 90%, Autologous Stem cell transplant (SCT) in 2 pts, radiation in 4 and salvage therapies in 10(Table 1). Ten pts had ≥3 prior therapies. The ongoing phase II enrolled 14 pts with 85% >60 years. In the phase II the ORR was 50% and the median follow-up was 18 months 5 patients achieved CR and 2 PR (AITL, PTCL with TfH and ALCL). In addition, there were 3 CRs (ALCL and PTCL with TfH) in the phase I portion. No responses were seen in the 3 MF pts. Of the 8 pts (Figure 1A) who achieved a CR, 4 have been off treatment for >1 year without relapse, 2 are still on therapy for >2 years, and 1 underwent a haplo-SCT (9 months after the last dose of pembrolizumab, without GVHD). The most common ≥ grade 3 adverse events were nausea, vomiting (n=1) and fatigue (n= 2). Two patients experienced hyperprogression within the first 10 days of treatment. The four patients who stopped therapy due to development of immune related adverse events (iRAE)- Grade 1 cytokine storm, Grade 3 gastritis, Grade 4 colitis and Grade 2 pneumonitis, respectively- all of which were reversible with steroid treatment. 13 pts were available for correlative studies of PD-L1 expression. The median PD-L1 expression in responders was 10 and ranged from < 5% (n=3) to 95% (n=1). PD-L1 in the 2 hyperprogressors were 0% and 10% respectively. The pts who achieved CR had a higher level of PD-L1 compared to those who achieved PR or SD (p= 0.048) (Figure 1B). Of the 2 ALCL pts with CR, 1 pt was ALK+ and 1 was ALK negative; the PD-L1 expression was 95% and 60% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Romidepsin and Pembrolizumab in patients with r/r TCL demonstrates an ORR of 50% which was durable and with acceptable safety in pts over the age of 60. Pts achieving CR included those with diagnosis of ALCL, AITL and PTCL with TfH phenotype and those expressing higher levels of PD-L1. Moreover, they also maintained a longer duration of response than with prior therapies. Additional studies evaluating the cell of origin expression will be reported at the Annual Meeting. Disclosures Iyer: Target Oncology: Honoraria; Curio Biosciences: Honoraria; Trillium: Research Funding; Afffimed: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Spectrum: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Rhizen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; CRISPR: Research Funding. Lee:Oncternal Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Guidepoint Blogal: Consultancy. Parmar:Cellenkos Inc.: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Nieto:Affimed: Consultancy, Other: Grant Support; Novartis: Other: Grant Support; Astra Zeneca: Other: Grant Support; Secura Bio: Other: Grant Support. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Westin:Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; 47: Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nastoupil:LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Honoraria; Karus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/KITE: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Khouri:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Wang:Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nobel Insights: Consultancy; VelosBio: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; InnoCare: Consultancy; Oncternal: Consultancy, Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Verastem: Research Funding; Beijing Medical Award Foundation: Honoraria; Lu Daopei Medical Group: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; OMI: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pulse Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; BioInvent: Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Molecular Templates: Research Funding. Vega:NCI: Research Funding. Flowers:Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Neelapu:N/A: Other; Unum Therapeutics: Other, Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Patents & Royalties; Legend Biotech: Other; Adicet Bio: Other; Calibr: Other; Karus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: personal fees; Celgene: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: personal fees; Allogene Therapeutics: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Cell Medica/Kuur: Other: personal fees; Incyte: Other: personal fees. OffLabel Disclosure: Pembrolizumab in T cell lymphoma

Abstract:Abstract Introduction DLBCL is an aggressive disease that can be classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) into GCB and non-GCB or by gene expression profiling (GEP) into GCB, activated B-cell (ABC), and unclassified subtypes. RCHOP is the standard frontline treatment (tx) for DLBCL with a 60% cure rate. Ibrutinib (ibr), an oral covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed activity in relapsed/refractory ABC DLBCL. This study aimed to analyze if the addition of ibr to RCHOP would improve efficacy in previously untreated patients (pts) with non-GCB DLBCL or the ABC subtype. Methods Pts with centralized IHC-confirmed non-GCB DLBCL were randomized 1:1 to standard RCHOP with either ibr (560 mg/d, po) or placebo (pbo) on a 21-day cycle for 6 or 8 cycles. Pts were stratified by revised International Prognostic Index, region (US/Western Europe vs rest of world), and number of prespecified RCHOP cycles (6 or 8). ABC DLBCL was retrospectively identified using GEP (HTG EdgeSeq cell of origin assay). Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS), defined as time from randomization to progression, relapse from complete response (CR), initiation of tx for PET-positive or biopsy-proven residual disease after ≥ 6 cycles of RCHOP, or death, in the intent-to-treat (ITT) or ABC population. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), CR rate, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Overall, 838 pts were randomized to ibr + RCHOP (n = 419) or pbo + RCHOP (n = 419). Median age was 62 years (yrs) with 58.5% < 65 yrs; 67.7% had ABC subtype. Baseline prognostic factors were balanced; slightly more pts ≥ 65 yrs in the ibr + RCHOP arm (45% vs 38%). In the ibr + RCHOP and pbo + RCHOP arms, 80.8% and 90.7% of pts received ≥ 6 cycles of RCHOP; 22.4% and 13.6% discontinued tx (all drugs) with adverse event (AE) being the most common reason (12.2% vs 5.3%). All deaths rate was 16.5% vs 17.2% in the ibr + CHOP vs pbo + RCHOP arm, respectively. In pts < 65 yrs, 90.4% vs 91.1% of pts received ≥ 6 cycles of RCHOP in the ibr + RCHOP vs pbo + RCHOP arm, respectively. Fewer pts ≥ 65 yrs in the ibr + RCHOP arm (69.0%) received ≥ 6 cycles of RCHOP compared with the pbo + RCHOP arm (90.0%). Ibr pharmacokinetics with RCHOP was similar to other studies in B-cell malignancies where ibr was used as a single agent or in combination. Median follow-up was 34.8 months. Ibr + RCHOP did not improve EFS in pts with non-GCB (by IHC) or ABC (by GEP) DLBCL: The hazard ratio (HR) for EFS was 0.934 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.726-1.200) for the ITT and 0.949 (95% CI, 0.704-1.279) for the ABC subset. Multivariate analysis showed a significant interaction (based on SAP prespecified 1-sided α level p < 0.1) between tx effect and age as a continuous or categorical variable. Efficacy was a function of age: stable benefit seen in younger pts, with a decline with increasing age, and benefit no longer favorable in pts ≥ 65 yrs. Efficacy outcomes favored ibr + RCHOP-treated pts < 65 years with statistically significant risk reduction in EFS (30%), PFS (33%), and OS (43%; Table, Figure). A similar trend was seen in the ABC subset. Multivariate analyses, adjusting for other baseline covariates, confirmed the tx benefit in younger but not elderly pts. Grade ≥ 3 AE rates were 89.9% and 87.1% in the ibr + RCHOP and pbo + RCHOP arms, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs) were greater in the ibr + RCHOP vs pbo + RCHOP arm (53.1% vs 34.0%), particularly febrile neutropenia and pneumonia, as were AEs leading to RCHOP discontinuation. In pts ≥ 65 yrs, there were more SAEs (67.4% vs 40.6%) and pts who received < 6 cycles of RCHOP (31.0% vs 10.0%) in the ibr + RCHOP vs pbo + RCHOP arm. In pts < 65 yrs, grade ≥ 3 AEs were similar; SAEs were numerically higher (41.5% vs 29.8%) in the ibr + RCHOP vs pbo + RCHOP arm, but the proportion of pts who received < 6 cycles of RCHOP was similar (9.6% vs 8.9%) between arms. Conclusions While the addition of ibr to RCHOP did not improve efficacy in the ITT population, there was a significant interaction between tx and age. Among pts ≥ 65 yrs, unexpected increased toxicity associated with ibr + RCHOP resulted in reduced RCHOP exposure, which may explain in part the worse clinical benefit/risk profile of pts in the ibr + RCHOP vs pbo + RCHOP arm. However, in pts < 65 yrs, the addition of ibr showed clinically meaningful improvement in EFS, PFS, and OS with an acceptable safety profile. Funding Source Sponsored by Janssen. Writing assistance was provided by Liqing Xiao of PAREXEL and funded by Janssen. Disclosures Younes: J&J: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Curis: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Sehn:Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Johnson:Takeda: Honoraria, Travel, accommodations, expenses; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy; Boeringher Ingelheim: Consultancy; Zenyaku Kogyo: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Genmab: Consultancy. Zinzani:Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lopez-Hernandez:Servier: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Dührsen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Carey:Janssen Research & Development: Employment. Liu:Janssen Research & Development: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shreeve:Janssen Research & Development: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Janssen Research & Development: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vermeulen:Janssen Research & Development: Employment, Equity Ownership.

P1214: Subcutaneous Epcoritamab + R-Chop For First-Line Treatment Of Patients With High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Phase 1/2 Update

First-line treatment (Tx) with subcutaneous (SC) epcoritamab (epco) + R-CHOP in patients (pts) with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): Phase 1/2 data update.

Phase 3 trial of subcutaneous epcoritamab + R-CHOP versus R-CHOP in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): EPCORE DLBCL-2.

Metabolic response rates of epcoritamab + R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated (1L) high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including double-hit/triple-hit lymphoma: Updated EPCORE NHL-2 data.

Subcutaneous epcoritamab + R-DHAX/C in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT): Preliminary phase 1/2 results.

Preliminary Results from a Phase I Study of SHC014748M in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-Cell Lymphomas

Epcoritamab, a Novel, Subcutaneous CD3xCD20 Bispecific T-Cell–Engaging Antibody, in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Dose Expansion in a Phase I/II Trial

Epcoritamab SC + GemOx Leads to High Complete Metabolic Response Rates in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Updated Results from Epcore NHL-2

Epcoritamab in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: 2-year follow-up from the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 trial

Abstract 3732: Peripheral pharmacodynamic activity of epcoritamab as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab + lenalidomide in patients with follicular lymphoma

Clinical Response and Biomarker Analysis of a Phase II Basket Trial of Toripalimab, a PD-1 Mab in Combination with Standard Chemotherapy As a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Solid Tumors.

Epcoritamab monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE NHL-1): a phase 2 cohort of a single-arm, multicentre study

A Multi-Center Phase II Study of Toripalimab with Chemotherapy in Patients with EGFR Mutant Advanced NSCLC Patients Resistant to EGFR TKIs: Efficacy and Biomarker Analysis.

Phase II Clinical Trial of R-CHOP Combined with Lenalidomide in the First-Line Treatment for Patients with High Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Epcoritamab (epco) with gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GemOx) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) induces high response rate even in pts failing CAR T therapy.

A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Romidepsin Demonstrates Durable Responses in Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma (TCL)

A Phase I/II Study to Examine the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab 200 Mg Fixed Dose Administered Every 3 Weeks (Q3W) in Combination with Romidepsin in Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL)

Final analysis of the phase IB part of the LOC-R01 trial, a non-comparative randomized phase IB/II study of escalating doses of lenalidomide and ibrutinib in association with R-MPV for patients with a newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

R‐CHOP WITH SINTILIZUMAB IN FIRST‐LINE TREATMENT OF LARGE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA PATIENTS WITH TP53 MUTATIONS AND PD‐L1 EXPRESSION: A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER CLINICAL STUDY

A Global, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (RCHOP) in Patients with Previously Untreated Non-Germinal Center B-Cell-like (GCB) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)