Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

kProp: Multi-neuron Relaxation Method for Neural Network Robustness Verification.

Improving Neural Network Verification through Spurious Region Guided Refinement.

A Dual Relaxation Method for Neural Network Verification

An RNN-Based Framework for the MILP Problem in Robustness Verification of Neural Networks.

Tight Neural Network Verification via Semidefinite Relaxations and Linear Reformulations

Attack-Guided Efficient Robustness Verification of ReLU Neural Networks

Efficient Neural Network Verification via Layer-based Semidefinite Relaxations and Linear Cuts

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Multi-Neuron Unleashes Expressivity of ReLU Networks Under Convex Relaxation

Efficient Complete Verification of Neural Networks Via Layerwised Splitting and Refinement

Global Robustness Verification Networks

Tightened Convex Relaxations for Neural Network Robustness Certification

Towards Optimal Branching of Linear and Semidefinite Relaxations for Neural Network Robustness Certification

Conv-Reluplex : A Verification Framework For Convolution Neural Networks (S).

Automatic Perturbation Analysis on General Computational Graphs

A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networks

Expediting Neural Network Verification via Network Reduction

Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examples

Automated Design of Linear Bounding Functions for Sigmoidal Nonlinearities in Neural Networks

Provably Bounding Neural Network Preimages

Robustness Verification of Classification Deep Neural Networks Via Linear Programming.