Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

Robustness Verifcation in Neural Networks

Robustness of Neural Networks: A Probabilistic and Practical Approach

Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspective

Robustness Verification of Classification Deep Neural Networks Via Linear Programming.

Efficient Robustness Verification of the Deep Neural Networks for Smart IoT Devices

Verification of Neural Networks' Global Robustness

A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networks

Certifying Global Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Global Robustness Verification Networks

Verifying Global Neural Network Specifications using Hyperproperties

Tight Verification of Probabilistic Robustness in Bayesian Neural Networks

Attack-Guided Efficient Robustness Verification of ReLU Neural Networks

Provably Tightest Linear Approximation for Robustness Verification of Sigmoid-like Neural Networks.

Input Validation for Neural Networks via Runtime Local Robustness Verification

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Robustness Verification of Swish Neural Networks Embedded in Autonomous Driving Systems

Automated Design of Linear Bounding Functions for Sigmoidal Nonlinearities in Neural Networks

Eager Falsification for Accelerating Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks

Learning Minimal Neural Specifications

Set-Based Training for Neural Network Verification

Robustness Certificates for Implicit Neural Networks: A Mixed Monotone Contractive Approach