Abstract:Cross cultural differences in behavioral and verbal norms and expectations can undermine credibility, often triggering a lie bias which can result in false convictions. However, current understanding is heavily North American and Western European centric, hence how individuals from non-western cultures infer veracity is not well understood. We report novel research investigating native Arabic speakers' truth and lie judgments having observed a matched native language forensic interview with a mock person of interest. 217 observers viewed a truthful or a deceptive interview and were directed to attend to detailedness as a veracity cue or given no direction. Overall, a truth bias (66% accuracy) emerged, but observers were more accurate (79%) in the truth condition with the truthful interviewee rated as more plausible and more believable than the deceptive interviewee. However, observer accuracy dropped to just 23% when instructed to use the detailedness cue when judging veracity. Verbal veracity cues attended too were constant across veracity conditions with 'corrections' emerging as an important veracity cue. Some results deviate from the findings of research with English speaking western participants in cross- and matched-culture forensic interview contexts, but others are constant. Nonetheless, this research raises questions for research to practice in forensic contexts centred on the robustness of western centric psychological understanding for non-western within culture interviews centred on interview protocols for amplifying veracity cues and the instruction to note detailedness of verbal accounts which significantly hindered Arabic speaker's performance. Findings again highlight the challenges of pancultural assumptions for real-world practices.

Beyond 50%: providing contextual and coaching information substantially improves adults' ability to detect children's lies

The Diagnostic Value of Children's Responses to Cross-Examination Questioning

Linguistic Cues Facilitate Children’s Understanding of Belief-Reporting Sentences

Does (Biasing) Nonverbal Information Deteriorate the Accuracy of the Take‐the‐Best Heuristic for Deception Detection?

To Lie or Not to Lie? The Influence of Parenting and Theory-of-Mind Understanding on Three-Year-Old Children's Honesty.

Everyone's a Critic (Sometimes): Young Children Show High Awareness of, But Lower Adherence to, Prosocial Lying Norms

Poor lie detection related to an under-reliance on statistical cues and overreliance on own behaviour

Truthful yet misleading: Elementary second-order deception in school-age children and its sociocognitive correlates

Detecting lies in investigative interviews through the analysis of response latencies and error rates to unexpected questions

Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection

Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses

The Impact of Lie to Me on Viewers’ Actual Ability to Detect Deception

The role of theory of mind, executive function and language on children's lying behaviour

Complications travel: A cross‐cultural comparison of the proportion of complications as a verbal cue to deceit

Reducing child witnesses' false reports of misinformation from parents

The Social Context of Police Lying

"Tell me about your trip": Introducing the enhanced ghostwriter lie detection tool.

Young Children Selectively Hide the Truth About Sensitive Topics

Effect of lie labelling on children's evaluation of selfish, polite, and altruistic lies

Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities

Do They Really Mean It? Children's Inference of Speaker Intentions and the Role of Age and Gender