Abstract:Purpose/Objective: MR and CT fusion with CT-based dose calculation has become a routine procedure for IMRT treatment planning. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical implementation of MRI-based treatment planning (MRI simulation) for prostate cancer. MRI simulation retains the superior soft-tissue contrast for image segmentation while eliminates the potential error in image fusion due to variations in patient position between CT and MRI and uncertainties in localizing the same structures between the two data sets. Furthermore, MRI simulation will avoid redundant CT imaging sessions, which in turn will avoid unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient, reduce treatment cost, and save patient, staff and machine time. Materials/Methods: A 0.23 T open MR scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH) was used for this study. Patients were scanned in a supine position in an alpha cradle with knee support and foot holder. One axial reference T2-weighted MR image was obtained with three donut-shaped fiducials on the skin to mark the approximate center of the prostate. A saggittal image was obtained through the center of the prostate as depicted on the axial image. The fiducials were then adjusted to mark the isocenter using a set of trackable lasers. The MRI data consisted of 48 slices (3-mm thickness) covering the whole pelvis. Skin marks were then made for daily treatment setup. The MR images were post processed using a gradient distortion correction (GDC) program provided by the vendor. The prostate and other critical structures were contoured and then transferred together with the MRI data to a commercial inverse planning system. Twenty IMRT plans were made using both unit density MRI and CT with the same beam angles, dose constraints and optimization parameters and the resulting plans were compared in terms of isodose distributions and dose volume histograms (DVH). A hybrid plan is generated for both the CT-based plan and the MR-based plan using the leaf sequences and associated MU designed for the corresponding patient plans. The physical phantom is then irradiated using the same leaf sequences to verify the dosimetry accuracy of the treatment plans. Results: Donut shaped fiducial markers worked well in isocenter localization since the center of the fiducial marker could be clearly determined in one MR slice. The CORVUS treatment planning system (version 5.0) allowed dose calculation on both CT and MRI. Small discrepancies (3–5%) in structure volumes were observed between CT and MR due to image resolution and algorithmic differences in volume determination. Small (∼1.5 cm) differences were also found in external contours between CT and MRI due to residual MRI distortion, which resulted in some differences in intensity maps. However, the final dose distributions were equally acceptable based on our clinical criteria (e.g., V95 = 100% of the prescribed target dose, R40 < 35%, R50 < 17% of the rectal volume, etc.). The absolute dose agreed within 3% between measured dose and dose predicted by the planning system in the physical phantom. The BAT ultrasound system was used for daily target localization and a MRI based DRR was used as a reference to assist setup verification. Conclusions: Our results showed that MRI-based simulation meets the accuracy requirement for patient setup, image segmentation, dose calculation and treatment verification for prostate treatment. Commissioning and quality assurance procedures have been developed for MRI simulation and are being implemented clinically for prostate IMRT at this institution.

Using Longitudinal MRI to Manage Proton Range Uncertainty for Pediatric Proton Craniospinal Irradiation.

Early in vivo Radiation Damage Quantification for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation Using Longitudinal MRI for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy

Accuracy of UTE-MRI-based patient setup for brain cancer radiation therapy.

Distortion-Free Diffusion MRI using an MRI-Guided Tri-Cobalt 60 Radiotherapy System: Sequence Verification and Preliminary Clinical Experience.

Physics-informed Multi-Modal Imaging-Based Material Characterization for Proton Therapy

A framework for voxel-based assessment of biological effect after proton radiotherapy in pediatric brain cancer patients using multi-modal imaging

Technical Development and In Silico Implementation of SyntheticMR in Head and Neck Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 0/1 Technology Development Report

Dosimetric Deviations of Bragg-Peak Position Shifts in Uniform Magnetic Fields for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guiding Proton Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Study

Multimodal imaging-based material mass density estimation for proton therapy using supervised deep learning

Investigating the Feasibility of Rapid MRI for Image-Guided Motion Management in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

Clinical implementation of MRI simulation for IMRT of prostate cancer

MRI-based Material Mass Density and Relative Stopping Power Estimation via Deep Learning for Proton Therapy

Multimodal Imaging-based Material Mass Density Estimation for Proton Therapy Using Physics-Constrained Deep Learning

Simultaneous Motion Monitoring and Truth-In-Delivery Analysis Imaging Framework for MR-guided Radiotherapy

Quantitative longitudinal mapping of radiation-treated prostate cancer using MR fingerprinting with radial acquisition and subspace reconstruction

Dosimetric impact of geometric distortions in an MRI-only proton therapy workflow for lung, liver and pancreas

Proton beam behavior in a parallel configured MRI-proton therapy hybrid: Effects of time-varying gradient magnetic fields

MRI-only based material mass density and relative stopping power estimation via deep learning for proton therapy: a preliminary study

A component method to delineate surgical spine implants for proton Monte Carlo dose calculation

Multi‐collimator proton minibeam radiotherapy with joint dose and PVDR optimization

Deep learning-enabled MRI-only photon and proton therapy treatment planning for paediatric abdominal tumours