Multimodal Imaging-based Material Mass Density Estimation for Proton Therapy Using Physics-Constrained Deep Learning
Chih-Wei Chang,Raanan Marants,Yuan Gao,Matthew Goette,Jessica E. Scholey,Jeffrey D. Bradley,Tian Liu,Jun Zhou,Atchar Sudhyadhom,Xiaofeng Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.13150
IF: 4.506
2022-07-26
Medical Physics
Abstract:Mapping computed tomography (CT) number to material property dominates the proton range uncertainty. This work aims to develop a physics-constrained deep learning-based multimodal imaging (PDMI) framework to integrate physics, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and advanced dual-energy CT (DECT) to derive accurate patient mass density maps. Seven tissue substitute MRI phantoms were used for PDMI-based material calibration. The training inputs are from MRI and twin-beam dual-energy images acquired at 120 kVp with gold and tin filters. The feasibility investigation included an empirical DECT correlation and four residual networks (ResNet) derived from different training inputs and strategies by the PDMI framework. PRN-MR-DE and RN-MR-DE denote ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using MRI and DECT images. PRN-DE and RN-DE represent ResNet trained with and without a physics constraint using DECT-only images. For the tissue surrogate study, PRN-MR-DE, PRN-DE, and RN-MR-DE result in mean mass density errors: -0.72%, 2.62%, -3.58% for adipose; -0.03%, -0.61%, and -0.18% for muscle; -0.58%, -1.36%, and -4.86% for 45% HA bone. The retrospective patient study indicated that PRN-MR-DE predicted the densities of soft tissue and bone within expected intervals based on the literature survey, while PRN-DE generated large density deviations. The proposed PDMI framework can generate accurate mass density maps using MRI and DECT images. The physics-constrained training can further enhance model efficacy, making PRN-MR-DE outperform RN-MR-DE. The patient investigation also shows that the PDMI framework has the potential to improve proton range uncertainty with accurate patient mass density maps.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?