Plan Quality Evaluation and Preliminary Application of a Novel Plan Difficulty Index in Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer
Q. Li,H. Luo,H. Peng,M. Zhong,X. Liu,D. Qiu,H. Yang,Y. He,C. Li,L. Yin,X. Huang,X. Tian,G. He,Y. Wang,F. Jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.850
2019-01-01
Abstract:To propose a novel plan difficulty index (PDI) and an optimal PDI-based evaluation criterion and evaluate their applications in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of lung cancer, in order to provide quality assurance (QA) in EBRT planning. Thirty-four EBRT plans of lung cancer with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique were retrospectively analyzed in this paper, and the prescription dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). To obtain an optimal evaluation criterion of plan quality, four scoring models were investigated to mark these plans, segmented uniform score (SU), segmented non-uniform score (SNU), non-segmented uniform score (NSU), non-segmented non-uniform score (NSNU). Every evaluation model with a total score of 100 contained 12 metrics. For PTV, there were 5 metrics (V60, V57, V66, Conformation Number (CN) [57 Gy] and Dmax). For organs at risk (OARs), there were 6 metrics (V5, V20, V30 of lung, V30, V40 of heart and Dmax of spinal cord), And 1 metric of ‘Global Max Location’ indicated the anatomic location of global maximum of dose. Given the anatomic location of PTV and OARs, a novel PDI was defined firstly in our study. Also, the relationship between PDI and corresponding plan score was evaluated. The average PDI of 34 IMRT plans was 4.19 (2.64-7.25) for the uniform score model or 4.45 (2.89-7.96) for the non-uniform score model. There were significant differences in the plan scores between different models, and these scores were 72.34±10.10, 69.40±12.06, 53.11±10.44 and 50.30±11.67 for SU, SNU, NSU and NSNU model, respectively. The pass rate of plans with quality scores of ≥70 in the SU model was superior to the other three models, 64.7% vs. 38.2% (SNU), 5.9% (NSU), or 2.9% (NSNU). The PDI and quality score of plan showed a negative correlation, regardless of which model was used. The Pearson coefficients were -0.52 (P<0.05), -0.49 (P<0.05), -0.59 (P<0.05) and -0.53 (P<0.05) for SU, SNU, NSU and NSNU model, respectively. The negative correlation between the PDI and plan score demonstrates the feasibility of PDI and evaluation criterion in planning QA for EBRT in lung cancer. Due to the highest pass rate, the evaluation model of segmented uniform score was recommended to mark the EBRT plan in future clinical practice.