Abstract:With technological advance has come the possibility of a new era of abundance. Technologies like 3D printing and robotics promise to lower the costs of production and distribution of goods and services, presumably making these goods and services readily available to those across income and wealth spectrums. This undoubtedly is a good thing. But what will be the effect of these technologies on existing wealth inequalities and the psychological and societal burdens they impose? Can we expect that this newfound abundance will help remedy the current historic levels of inequality in the U.S. and other western countries? Unfortunately, the answer is likely no, for two reasons. First, history suggests that inequality often persists even under conditions of abundance due to dynamics of power and politics and ongoing impacts of structural inequalities. Having more than enough of a particular good or service to go around does not guarantee that all will have access to this good or service. Second, even if the new abundance enabled by technology extends into all levels of the socioeconomic spectrum, enabling individuals to access goods and services (and their attendant benefits) previously beyond their reach, the harms that attend unequal societies will persist. Increasing evidence suggests that these harms, including increased violence and decreased health, arise not from access (or a lack thereof) to particular goods and services, but from the adverse psychological consequences of living in an unequal society. This is a psychological burden shared not just by those at the losing end of the inequality equation, but also those who enjoy a relative advantage in society. Unequal societies are psychologically harmful to all who live in them, regardless of where these individuals fall on the socioeconomic spectrum, and largely independent of the particular goods and services they enjoy. The upshot is that society cannot rely on new abundance technologies to automatically solve problems of inequality and the social and psychological burdens that plague those who live in unequal societies. Indeed, depending on how society responds to questions of access to these technologies, their introduction might exacerbate various forms of inequality. In light of this, it is crucial to address conditions of inequality head-on, so that the new era of abundance promised by technological advance can lead to real gains in individual and societal wellbeing.

Why the world cannot afford the rich

Income Gap, Materialism, and Attitude toward the Rich in Developing Countries

Income Inequality and Social Dysfunction

Global Inequality and Global Poverty

The health costs of political failure

Triple Bottom Line or Trilemma? Global Tradeoffs Between Prosperity, Inequality, and the Environment

Green with envy? The effects of inequality and equity within and across social groups on greenhouse gas emissions, 1990–2020

How living in economically unequal societies shapes our minds and our social lives

The need for social equality from emerging patterns in business and costs towards environmental sustainability in a new paradigm shift

Reducing global inequality increases local cooperation: a simple model of group selection with a global externality

Earth support systems: Threatened? why? what can we do?

Inequality in abundance

Equalitarian Societies are Economically Impossible

Renewable energy, inequality and environmental degradation

High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization

Perceived economic inequality inhibits pro‐environmental engagement

The Equity in Sustainability: Unravelling Financial Realities and Global South Perspective on Mitigating Carbon Emission

Barriers to Environmental Sacrifice: The Interaction of Free Rider Fears with Education, Income, and Ideology

Inequality and Misperceptions of Group Concerns Threaten the Integrity and Societal Impact of Science

Urban sustainability in an age of enduring inequalities: Advancing theory and ecometrics for the 21st-century city

Affluence and the Demand-side for Policy Improvements: Exploring Elite Beliefs About Vulnerability to Societal Problems